Chang, Ya-FeiYa-FeiChangANNE CHAOPO-YUAN SHIHYEN-CHUN HSUCHEN-TSE LEEYU-WEN TIENYU-CHANG YEHChen, Lee-WeiLee-WeiChenNTUH Center of Microcirculation Medical Research (NCMMR)2020-02-202020-02-2020180022-4804https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85045207127&doi=10.1016%2fj.jss.2018.03.040&partnerID=40&md5=9f10d251ac7c2526b762d5fb3a5a3df5https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/461832[SDGs]SDG3dexmedetomidine; opiate; propofol; dexmedetomidine; narcotic analgesic agent; propofol; abdominal surgery; aged; Article; blood pressure; bradycardia; cardiac index; controlled study; critically ill patient; delirium; female; heart output; heart rate; hemodynamics; human; hypotension; length of stay; major clinical study; male; mean arterial pressure; priority journal; randomized controlled trial; surgical intensive care unit; urine volume; analgesia; bradycardia; chemically induced; comparative study; critical illness; delirium; drug effect; hemodynamics; hypotension; incidence; intensive care; intensive care unit; middle aged; pain measurement; postoperative care; postoperative pain; procedures; statistics and numerical data; surgery; treatment outcome; very elderly; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Bradycardia; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypotension; Incidence; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Care; Propofol; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment OutcomeComparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on hemodynamics in surgical critically ill patientsjournal article10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.040299072112-s2.0-85045207127