2015-01-012024-05-15https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/663973摘要：本計畫試圖解釋台灣禽流感防疫政策與全球性技術治理模型的差異，以及相關政策的爭議和社會影響，以釐清全球風險治理機制和在地政經社會脈絡間的互動和張力。2003年來禽流感跨國散布，使得各國逐漸採納國際組織發展出的科學化治理模型，如強化通報機制、推動禽類產銷現代化等。然而，台灣禽流感防疫政策卻爭議不斷，包括農委會被指控隱匿疫情，專家的公正性遭懷疑，以及業者對「禁宰活禽」法令的反彈等。本研究因此欲分析科學化的疫情治理模型，如何與在地治理實踐產生連結和斷裂，以及是哪些因素形塑了台灣防疫政策的在地性格。 除了分析不同政府單位的官員和學者專家等顯而易見的行動者之外，我特別檢視過去政策討論中看不見的行動者—家禽產銷業者和公民團體—在防疫政策制定和實作過程中扮演的角色。我將研究這些行動者如何各自整合、詮釋、援引、甚至挑戰科學化的防疫治理機制，如何理解這套模型，並重新編派自身對風險的認知和回應策略。本研究採多重資料分析，包括文獻回顧、訪談與田野調查。我希望透過瞭解台灣案例中在地行動者如何援引、收編、或對抗科學化治理機制，以及他們如何整合生產出「在地知識」(local knowledge)，來豐富有關全球治理、專家政治、與科技和社會的相關文獻，並澄清這些行動者所展現的能動性和限制，以期對未來防疫政策提出建言。 <br> Abstract: Why were avian flu prevention and control policies controversial in Taiwan? How did local actors accept, resist, or tailor global scientized disease control regime? This research project aims to investigate how diverse local actors have shaped disease control policies and practices in Taiwan. Rather than assuming that science is apolitical and that scientific development undoubtedly leads to cross-country policy adoption, I argue that the diffusion and imposition of global science-based policy models must be embedded within the socioeconomic and political context in the country of interest. By taking into account different, and sometimes contradictory, responses made by Taiwanese actors, this project intends to demonstrate that avian flu policies and knowledge have been shaped by the interactions, negotiations, or lack thereof between diverse domestic actors. I will examine the social process of localization of science-based global regime, and the associated social controversies. More specifically, I plan to investigate how crucial actors reconfigured science-based policies, recognized and conceptualized risks, resorted to or resisted new artifacts/technologies/systems, and produced local knowledge in response to the threat of avian flu. These crucial actors include governmental technobureaucrats, specialized scientists and experts, poultry producers at different scales and with different modes, and civil society activists. My analytical approaches include analyzing related disease control policies and controversies, exploring the participation and opinions of relevant actors, and examining how the poultry sector reacted to and was impacted by the global disease prevention and control model, and how actors developed strategies to adapt to policy changes. Data for this study include archives, participant observation, and in-depth interviews. This project not only intends to enrich the current literature on contested science and policy making, such as scientization, technocracy, global governance, norm diffusion, and local knowledge, but it may also provide policy reform implications.禽流感專家政治決策科學化在地知識科技物Avian InfluenzaTechnocracyScientizationLocal KnowledgeArtifact