2013-01-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/699015摘要：台灣採取混合式自由經濟制度，歷經60年的發展，從開發中國家進入已開發國家。其製造業從以生產代工的OEM、ODM為主的方式，逐漸轉型為以品牌製造（OBM）為主的生產方式。臺灣的產業結構也由以製造業為主轉為以服務業為主，雖然如此，由於是一個小規模開放性經濟，且資源貧乏，因此台灣國際貿易對臺灣特別重要，是維持與促進台灣經濟成長的關鍵。在國際貿易上競爭力是最重要的決勝關鍵，為了提升台灣製造業的競爭力，加強品牌創新與發展，提升附加價值、勞動生產力、總要素生產力，是目前台灣努力的重點。 相對的，中國大陸是一個由社會主義轉型為市場經濟的國家，其產業結構以製造業為主，生產方式大多是以代工的OEM，相對台灣而言，在品質與創新上與臺灣有相當的差距。相對台灣產業或廠商而言，中國大陸廠商生產的附加價值、勞動生產力，或總要素生產力等，其差距為何？而其影響因素又為何？在東亞的競爭地位又如何？這些都是值得深入比較與探討的議題。 　　本研究計畫分別探討台灣與中國加入WTO後，影響中國大陸製造業廠商勞動生產力與總要素生產力及創新活動的因素，以及影響台灣廠商生產力與創新活動的影響因素，過去探討這方面的文獻雖多，但本計畫則特著重研究在出口、產業經濟、產業聚集、出口、外資、國際化、創新、政府政策以及總體經濟因素等，對大陸與台灣廠商生產力與創新績效的影響。再者，本計畫將比較台灣與大陸廠商在生產力、創新活動的差距，最後本計畫將探討臺灣與大陸廠商在東亞的競爭。在比較時，將考慮一些重要產業，如電子產業、生技產業、汽車產業、紡織業等。<br> Abstract: After 60 years of development, Taiwan, which adopts a mixed liberal economic system, has progressed from developing country to amongst the developed. Our manufacturing industry has transited from the traditional outsourcing services such as OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and/or ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) to OBM (Original Brand Manufacturing) based production. The industrial structure has changed from manufacturing-based to service (tertiary) industry as mainstream. Despite the transition, due to the fact that Taiwan is operating at small open economy and lacking (natural) resources, international trade is the most valuable and most important key factor to maintain and stimulate Taiwanese economic growth. As a well-known fact, the key to success at international trade is competition; in order to raise the competitiveness of Taiwanese manufacturing industry, the followings are the key points to focus on: strengthening the innovation and development of the branding industry, raising the add-on values, labor productivity, and total factor productivity. Relatively speaking on, Mainland China has progressed from socialist economy to a market economy nation, bases its industrial structure on manufacturing industry which is mostly OEM; however when compared with Taiwanese industry there is still a considerable gap lagged behind in quality and innovation. How big is the gap between the Chinese industries’ add-on values, labor productivity, or total factor productivity and that of Taiwanese firms and industries? What are the influencing factors? What are Taiwan’s and China’s competitive position in South Asia? These are the questions and issues that are worth of in-depth comparative analysis and discussions. This research project will explore and discuss separately, after Taiwan’s and China’s entry to the WTO, the influencing factors on the labor productivity, total factor productivity, and innovative activities of the Chinese and Taiwanese manufacturing industry. Although, in the past there were several papers discussing the above issues, this project would focus heavily on the factors that would affect the productivities of both Taiwanese and Chinese firms, such as: exports, industrial economics, aggregated industries, foreign investments, internationalization, innovations, government policies, and other macroeconomic factors. Moreover, this project will estimate the gap between Taiwanese and Chinese firms in terms of productivity and innovations. Finally, this project would discuss the competitive position of Taiwanese and Chinese firms in Southeast Asia, considering by comparing major industries such as electronics, biotechnologies, automobiles, textiles…etc.生產力創新活動產業聚集臺灣中國productivityinnovationindustrial agglomerationTaiwanChina