2018-04-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/683910摘要：因黃春樹命案，徐自強被認為是共犯之一。 歷經一次大法官解釋，以及數次的非常上訴與更審，審判過程有許多可疑之處，如證詞的採用、鑑識技術的問題、共同被告的自白等等事實問題以及法律問題，故使得徐自強歷經被判處七次死刑、兩次無期，最終獲判無罪。 有必要系統性檢驗冤案的成因、脈絡，並透過司法官養成教育、警察養成教育等，改變現存於執法人員內部的問題，以避免下一個冤案的出現，不使人民蒙受錯誤判決之不利益。<br> Abstract: Due to Huang Chunshu’s（黃春樹） murder case, Xu Ziqiang（徐自強） was considered to be one of the accomplices. After a J.Y. Interpretation, and several times of extraordinary appeals and further trials, the trial process had many doubts, such as the use of testimony, problems of forensic technology, the confession of mutual defendants, and other factual issues and legal issues, which made Xu Ziqiang（徐自強） After being sentenced to seven deaths and two indefinite periods, he was finally found not guilty. It is therefore necessary to systematically examine the cause and context of the unjust case and to change the problems existing within the law enforcement officers through the education of the judicial officers and the education of police officers in order to avoid the appearance of the next case and not to make people It is not in the interest of a wrong judgment.徐自強冤案成因Xu Ziqiangthe cause of the unjust case