王遠義2006-07-262018-05-292006-07-262018-05-292002-07-31http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/21254在二十一世紀今日，為了使西方十八 世紀以來的政治思想仍有當代的意義，本 計畫希望就理性的限制此一思想方法入 手。此一方法自十八世紀以來，即為許多 重要政治思想家（論激進的或保守的）所 重視、承認與運用。而中外迄今，甚少學 者有系統地、廣泛地探討此一思想方法。In trying to make sense of modern political theory in thought and practice at the beginning of the twentieth-first century, the centerpiece notion of the limitations of rationality needs to be looked at anew. In this project I chart its ideological career from a progressive to a conservative idea. I argue that upon its inception in the eighteenth century it was used to promote ideals of secular, enlightened progress. I argue when it is realized that there are in fact two different models of explanations for the limitations of rationality: one progressively oriented, the other conservatively oriented. I argue, further, that the two models are historically related, and that are also fruitful to be invoked in contemporary political argumentation.application/pdf256334 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW國立臺灣大學歷史學系暨研究所啟蒙自由主義社會科學政治理論政治思想史理性海耶克福山彌爾柏克麥克弗爾森史金納波考克馬克思EnlightenmentLiberalismSocial SciencePolitical TheoryHistory of Political ThoughtRationalityHayekFukuyamaJ. S.. MillBurkeC. B.. MacphersonSkinnerPocockMarxreporthttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/21254/1/902414H002011.pdf