2009-05-062024-05-14https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/660681摘要：1954年司法院草擬了少年事件處理法的初稿，承襲了日本少年法，體現了保護主義的精神。其後雖然數度修法，名目上號稱「教罰並重」，但是事實上嚴罰已經成為傳統。1997年的新法企圖實現保護主義的理想，設計了早期的轉出機制、強調處遇中期的試驗觀察，其更進一步於處遇的後階段強化了多元的處遇選擇可能性。然而多元處遇的現況尚有諸多問題。首先，司法審判如何多方面引介其他力量加強需保護性的判斷。其次，轉出制度或中間處遇如何加以活性化。最後，狹義的保護處分的多樣化，對於已經經過中間審理階段的處遇而仍舊需要進一步處遇的少年，更應依照少年的類型（如觸法少年、虞犯少年以及犯罪少年）與需保護性的特性（例如環境因素抑或心性因素等），而給予不同的處遇方式會較為妥當，包括感化教育處所如何提供一個較為緩和的收容環境，或如何兼顧平等原則與賦予少年社會復歸機會。本研究欲釐清少年司法在行政與司法間如何使一個跨越兩者領域的「司法福利系統」成為可能。<br> Abstract: In 1954, Judicial Yuan drafted out the first Juvenile Accident Act(JAA) ,which refered to the protection of minor in Japanese Juvenile Law. After that, the JAA amendment took account of both education and punishment,but the strict punishment has actually replace the protection of minor. In 1997, new JAA set a series of diversion procedure to realize the ideal of protecting minor, and it also provides alternative treatment for minor in advance. However, the alternative treatment still meet some problem. First, how to make juridical trial handle the necessity of protection with collaboration of social works and administration department. Next, how to enable the effective use of diversion and intermediate sanctions. Finally, how to enhance the diversification of treatment which can give different ways of treatment to the different type of juvenile criminal,such as the validity of accommodation or the equality of inmates. This study aims to find out the possibility of "Judicial welfare system" between administration and justice department.少年事件處理法保護處分司法福利系統