Han N.-WMAO-WEI HUNG2022-04-262022-04-26202101676687https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105266245&doi=10.1016%2fj.insmatheco.2021.04.011&partnerID=40&md5=bb161a67065c07199decdaa234584f1chttps://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/608025We establish a continuous-time model to solve the optimal consumption-saving problem with life annuity. The decision-maker has ambiguous beliefs in the force of mortality and is averse to this model uncertainty. The ambiguity aversion is represented by the max-min principle under the framework of robust control. We show that the optimal annuity demand decreases with the extent of ambiguity aversion, bequest motives, and extent of relative risk aversion. For an individual with non-zero bequest motives, the optimal annuity demand becomes zero when the extent of ambiguity aversion exceeds a certain threshold. We also show that, even if the individual has access to actuarially fair annuities, the optimal consumption would have a hump-shaped path when the individual is ambiguity-averse. ? 2021 Elsevier B.V.Ambiguity aversionAnnuityBequest motivesConsumption humpRobust control[SDGs]SDG1[SDGs]SDG3[SDGs]SDG10The annuity puzzle and consumption hump under ambiguous life expectancyjournal article10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.04.0112-s2.0-85105266245