WEI-TING CHENY. H. LeeP. J. AdamsA. NenesJ. H. Seinfeld2018-09-102018-09-102010-05http://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/357344https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77952187225&doi=10.1029%2f2010GL042886&partnerID=40&md5=58e32b104b0c4d8852f6315d73e921a6If mitigation of black carbon (BC) particulate matter is accompanied by a decrease in particle number emissions, and thereby by a decrease in global cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, a decrease in global cloud radiative forcing (a reverse-gcloud albedo effect-h) results. We consider two present-day mitigation scenarios: 50% reduction of primary black carbon/organic carbon (BC/OC) mass and number emissions from fossil fuel combustion (termed HF), and 50% reduction of primary BC/OC mass and number emissions from all primary carbonaceous sources (fossil fuel, domestic biofuel, and biomass burning) (termed HC). Radiative forcing effects of these scenarios are assessed through present-day equilibrium climate simulations. Global average top-of-the- atmosphere changes in radiative forcing for the two scenarios, relative to present day conditions, are +0.13-2 0.33 W m.2 (HF) and + 0.31 ±0.33 W m.-2 (HC). Copyright © 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.[SDGs]SDG13Will black carbon mitigation dampen aerosol indirect forcing?journal article10.1029/2010gl0428862-s2.0-77952187225WOS:000277252400005