Guo, Jhe-CyuanJhe-CyuanGuoLin, Pei-ShanPei-ShanLinShau, Wen-YiWen-YiShauShao, Yu-YunYu-YunShaoKuo, Hung-YangHung-YangKuoChen, Chi-LingChi-LingChenCHIH-HUNG HSU2026-01-232026-01-232025-11-10https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/735543Anti-PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy (immunochemotherapy) has become standard first-line treatment for high PD-L1-expressing advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Benefits of immunochemotherapy for low PD-L1-expressing ESCC remain debatable. The Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases were systemically searched from inception till 10 August 2024. Randomized trials comparing first-line immunochemotherapy with chemotherapy in ESCC were identified and evaluated association of platinum plus paclitaxel (TP) or fluoropyrimidine (PF) chemotherapy regimen, stratified by PD-L1 expression levels, with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits. Pooled study-level hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS were calculated with a random-effects model. Eight studies involving 4733 participants were included. In high PD-L1 group, PFS (HR of TP: 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45-0.69] vs HR of PF: 0.53 [95% CI, 0.45-0.62]) and OS benefits (HR of TP: 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78] vs HR of PF: 0.59 [95% CI, 0.50-0.69]) did not significantly differ between two regimen subgroups (P = 0.75 and 0.90, respectively). In low PD-L1 group, TP regimen was associated with a significantly greater PFS benefit than PF regimen (HR of TP: 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.74] vs HR of PF: 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94]; P = 0.01) and TP regimen trended to associate with greater OS benefit over PF regimen (HR of TP: 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93] vs HR of PF: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.97]; P = 0.32). In patients with low PD-L1-expressing advanced ESCC, immunochemotherapy with TP may confer a greater PFS benefit than that with PF.enChemotherapyEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorPD-L1 expressionjournal article10.1007/s10388-025-01167-y41212384