葛克昌2006-07-252018-07-052006-07-252018-07-052001http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/12810法治國依法行政主義下，剝奪、限制人民之財產權須合乎比例原則並以法律為 之。職司憲法解釋的司法院大法官會議，近年來在不同領域，分別作成多號關於 財產權保障的釋憲解釋。因此為觀察憲法關於人民財產權保障制度的演變與保障 內容，從事整理、分析與評論大法官會議解釋，即有其必要。 本計劃預計就近年來司法院大法官會議解釋中關於人民財產權保障者，先行整 理、分門別類、並試圖以國內外憲法、行政法學說實務見解，評論其妥當性。討 論重點大略為﹕憲法上財產權之概念、財產權之制度性保障、財產權之限制與比 例原則、財產權之法律保留原則、租稅法律主義、財產權之正當法律程序、公用 徵收與損失補償。Our Constitution article 15 protects people ’s property right from infringement of the States.Only with due process of law,people ’s property right could be restricted or even deprived.In different fields our constitutional court has made a large amount of constitutional decis ions about the protection of people ’s property right in these years.For observing the evolution of constitutional protection of property right, to classify and analyze the related constitutional decisions would be necessary. This program intended to classify,categorize and analyze related constitutional decisions about people ’s property rights,and attempt to 2 comment with domestic and foreign legal theories.The topics of this program that we want to discuss should be:the Constitutional Concept of Property Right,Restriction and Due Process of Property Right, Proportionality Principle,Expropriation for Public Use,Loss Indemnity, National compensation.application/pdf1150773 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW國立臺灣大學法律學系暨研究所財產權制度性保障比例原則法律保留原則正當法律程序明確性原則公用徵收損失補償國家賠償信賴保護原則平等保護原則ConstitutionProperty RightInstitutional ProtectionProportionality PrincipleExpropriation for Public UseLoss IndemnityNational compensationDue Process of LawConstitutional Decisionreporthttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/12810/1/892414H002046.pdf