2014-01-012024-05-16https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/667627摘要：本計畫擬研究朝鮮儒丁若鏞（1762-1832）以及越南儒者黎貴惇（1726-1784）的經世學思想。丁若鏞為十八世紀末至十九世紀朝鮮實學的集大成者，其著述甚豐，為韓國歷史上少見的多產作家，其學主要涉及經學和經世學二大領域，思想內容博深。黎貴惇則是越南儒學發展最重要的時代──後黎朝（1427-1789）舉足輕重的哲學家。黎貴惇的儒學思想中傳承了豐富的理學遺產，其中又以朱子學的色彩最為濃厚。由於朱子學在東亞儒學圈的重要性，因此要掌握黎氏思想的理學線索，在研究策略上必須留意越南、中國與東亞等三個儒學背景之關係。 本計研究的重點有三：(1)二者對中國理學的攝納與轉換，特別是其思想與朱子學有何種承轉的關係。(2)二者之經學／儒學與經世學（經世濟民之學）的關係，特別是經學思想如何在實際的政治運作或社會轉型時產生指導作用。(3)二者的思想是否具有引領韓國、越南社會轉入現代性的意義。 　　在丁若鏞與黎貴惇的基礎研究之後，本計劃擬再進行整合研究，嘗試說明理學或朱子學在進入兩個不同地域時，所產生的不同影響及詮釋，用以觀察儒學或朱子學的論點，是否具有普世性而能對不同的社會產生正面的領導功能。這方面的整合研究，會將重點放在(1)二者對儒家經典與朱子學的評價及詮釋；(2)二者如何將其經學與理學轉換為具有實踐意義的政治思考或主張；(3)二者在面對社會變遷及國際時勢時，如何以其經學與理學的基礎思考社會的進展，而有向現代性發展的可能。 <br> Abstract: This is a continuity of our former project, i.e. the studies of Ch&#335;ng Yagyong’s Confucian classics, and its fruitful results have been published as a monograph entitled Ch&#335;ng Yagyong’s Four Books Learning in 2010. This specific book lays the groundwork for further research into Ch&#335;ng’s formation of his practical political ideas under his own thoughts in Confucianism. Whereas Vietnamese Confucian Le Quy Don’s studies of the governance emphasized the important of natural history, conventional wisdom and related East Asian Confucianism intellectual differences. From the perspective of East Asian, Zhuxi’s theory on principle and material force and theory of investigating things not only flourished in Chinese Confucianism, but expanded to Korean and Japan with different meanings. This project aims to present the homogeneity of East Asian Confucianism and the regional heterogeneity in East Asian Confucianism on the one hand. On the other hand, it also takes effort to probe into how Confucianism brings forth its reflection in modernity, which is quite different from its overall development in Western countries in the presence of Sohak.世論丁若鏞黎貴惇東亞儒學GovernanceCh&#335ng YagyongLe Quy DonEast Asian Confucianisms