2013-08-262024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/697816摘要：本計畫將焦點集中於立法體制的改革，探討開門立法與部門立法勢力的消長。筆者認為，研究官僚機構的角度可以避免將國家視為一個整體，而關於社會力量的分析則直接回答目前中國大陸政治過程的開放程度問題。除此以外，筆者也將研究主題擴充至開門立法對於政府治理品質提升的議題，探討政策制訂過程的開放是否有助於中國大陸政府的有效治理。據此，本計畫的研究目標不僅包括解釋政治過程產生變遷的原因，同時也將政治過程的變化當作自變項，說明其是否影響中國大陸治理情況的變化。<br> Abstract: In the past decades, the Chinese government has introduced varieties of channels for public participation in its legislative process. These include public hearings, workshops, and publishing draft laws to solicit feedback from its citizens. Why did the Chinese government open up its legislation? Several reasons have been identified by China observers. On the one hand, mass-line law-making could counterweight the notorious tradition of departmentalism. On the other hand, this new practice helped the Chinese government to collect more information about the society. Through an examination of China`s introduction of the “open-door legislation”, this project discusses whether the open-door legislation was welcomed by Chinese bureaucracies because it was still under their control.開門立法部門立法治理品質Open-door LegislationDepartmentalismQuality of Governance