2017-01-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/678600摘要：申請人專業領域為荀子學與東亞儒學。自2000年以來，陸續參與教育部補助的卓越計畫、邁頂計畫，皆聚焦於日韓近世儒學，同時並在科技部執行荀子相關研究計畫。今年度則執行「東亞視野中的韓國荀子學」研究計畫，此一計畫與過去十餘年深耕東亞儒學的研究成果息息相關。本計畫擬以三年時間（2017-2019），擴大「韓國荀子學」的研究視野，延伸於「日本荀子學」，日本荀子學中有多種注本，大家如荻生徂徠、皆川淇園與豬飼敬所皆曾注荀，成果遠超過韓國荀子學。近世東亞儒學中一股反程朱理學的潮流亦反映於中、日、韓的荀子學，此一思想特性具有實學傾向，即重視經世、經史之學而反對形上學。本計畫研究日韓《荀子》學，可以與子計畫1研究日韓《孟子》學互相整合，並與子計畫4（研究朝鮮「經世」概念）、子計畫5（研究中日儒學的關鍵字詞）與子計畫6（研究朝鮮儒學中的「正心」關鍵詞）相互呼應，大幅提昇本項整合型計畫中各子計畫之間的相關性。本計畫擬分三年進行： 　　第一年：聚焦以荻生徂徠為主的日本荀子學的思想特色。 　　第二年：探索韓國荀子學的思想特色，但與執行中的科技部計畫區隔，將聚焦於荀子學與朱子學的互動。 　　第三年：擬挖掘近世東亞儒學中之荀子學的共同特色。 <br> Abstract: The main stream of Tokugawa Japanese (1603-1868, 德川日本) Confucianism is anti-Zhu-Xi (朱熹, 1130-1200) school. Ogy&#363; Sorai’s (荻生徂徠, 1666-1728) interpretations of Xunzi reflects his concerns of “實學” (shixue) and his anti-metaphical interest. His book on Zunxi deserves close examinations. While the Tokugawa Confucianism tends to be against Zhu-Xi School, the Joseon Dynasty (朝鮮時代, 1392-1910) of Korean history features its creative development of Zhu Xi school. Under the overwhelming influence of Zhu Xi, Xunzi has been degraded as unorthodoxy. The main reason for the evaluation of Xunzi is his notion of “human nature is evil.” Although the main stream is against Xunzi, there are some scholars who emphasize Xunzi’s thought. Among those thinkers, Jeong Yakyong (丁若鏞, 1762-1836) is the most important and creative one. This three-years project will contain three parts: (1) to examine the main points of Ogy&#363; Sorai’s interpretations of Xunzi. (2) to explore the complicated connections between the Zhu Xi school and the interpretations of Xunzi in the Joseon Dynasty. (3) to feature the major characteristics of the interpretations of Xunzi shared by Japanese Confucianism and Korean Cofucianism.荀子詮釋學德川日本朝鮮XunzihermeneuticsTokugawa JapanJoseon Korea