2017-04-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/703895摘要：後人雖致力解讀《源氏物語》，但至今仍存在許多疑點，故申請人於博士論文中重新考察了幾處 有問題的注釋。然而，《源氏物語》在創作與校訂時產生數種本文，欲注釋字句，須先確認其共通性，因此申請人發覺本文乃為研究之本。 以往學者們多認為由藤原定家校訂出的「青表紙本」最接近原本型態，研究本文時，也以復原該本為旨。但近年學界體悟，早在作品問世時，便已有謄寫本與草稿本，故實不該故步自封；有必要瞭 解其他文本，因此有不少學者開始研究以往被視為非原型的諸校訂本。 然而，此類研究仍有不足。首先，以中世成立的麥生本為代表的文本，與主流的大島本相異甚多，頗值探討。且此類文本共有三套寫本；其中阿里莫本為近世抄本，可見其流傳之功。但學界尚未對此 文本作全面性的考察。此外，先行研究往往將分析點限縮於校訂者對人物的解釋。因此申請人欲比較此類文本與他本，且不侷限於考察人物。 基於文本留存狀況，在博士論文中，先網羅若菜上下卷中所有與他本相較下，短少十五字以上處考察，得出其簡化目的多在於省略類義字句。然而，《源氏物語》共有五十四卷，僅憑二卷，不足以知其全貌。此外，博士論文中對替換及增長詞句之處也只大略列舉數例，未及詳查。因此，本計畫擬 由首卷的桐壺卷開始進行考察，並深入探討上述兩種變化的原因，希冀藉此對掌握《源氏物語》整體的傳承與享受史有所貢獻。<br> Abstract: Considering that The Tale of Genji remains ambiguous even after many interpretations, the applicant reinvestigates some questionable annotations in the dissertation. In fact, many editions of The Tale of Genji were yielded during the process of the composition and proofreading of the masterpiece. That is why the common meaning of a sentence needs to be confirmed first for annotation. This is the applicant’s motivation of studying The Tale of Genji. In the past, most scholars, who thought that “Aobyoushibon” edited by Fujiwara no Sadaie was the edition closest to the prototype, have focused on the restoration of Aobyoushibon. However, over the past few years, many scholars discover that, before The Tale of Genji came out, the transcripts and manuscripts of the work had existed and that they should not be conservative and narrow-minded but open to other editions. This is why many researchers begin to investigate other non-prototype proofreading editions. However, this kind of research is insufficient. First, the editions represented by Munyuubon that appeared in the medieval Japan are too different from the mainstream Ooshimabon to be ignored. Secondly, this type of texts has three transcripts, among which Arimabon as a successful manuscript has been circulated in this modern world. However, there are little comprehensive investigation on this edition in the academic circles so far since the precedent study only focuses on the editors’ interpretation of the characters in The Tale of Genji. For this reason, the applicant strives to compare different editions rather than explore the characters. Based on the survival of the texts, the dissertation discusses the passages in Wakana Jyou and Ge that are 15 words less than those in other editions and concludes that the simplification is for the purpose of refining the redundant words or sentences. In fact, since The Tale of Genji totals 54 volumes, the investigation of two of them is not enough to unfold the whole masterpiece. Moreover, the dissertation only gives a few examples of substitutes and extending sentences but not explore them completely. Accordingly, the project intends to survey the volumes from Kiritubo and deepen the discussion on the causes of the two aforementioned variations. By doing so, it hopes to contribute to the inheritance of The Tale of Genji and the condition how people enjoyed this tale.源氏物語大島本麥生本中京大本阿里莫本The Tale of GenjiOoshimabonMunyuubonChyuukyoudaibonArimabon