郭斯傑臺灣大學：土木工程學研究所古元豐Ku,, Yeng-FongYeng-FongKu2007-11-252018-07-092007-11-252018-07-092007http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/50270國道高速公路建設工程具有經費龐大、施工期長、用地取得困難、工程施工技術複雜等特性，承攬廠商於施工履約期間與業主為爭取自身利益難免發生爭議、求償情事。在爭議、求償未符合承商認為合理的救濟或要求下，為解決爭議在目前制度下可經由協商和解、申請調解﹙調處﹚、仲裁、訴訟等程序獲致雙方可接受的結果。國道新建工程局與承攬廠商雙方合意經由仲裁解決爭議，當事人之一方便可提付仲裁，經由此一程序獲致雙方可接受的結果。 國工局自民國79年成立以迄共發生百餘起仲裁案例並已作成仲裁判斷確定，目前尚有20餘件等待仲裁或正在仲裁庭攻防之中。經筆者於蒐集並經過篩選得其中88個樣本，試圖利用SPSS程式(Statistical Package for the Social Science套裝軟體)作各工程處間的比較，包括發包金額、求償金額、仲裁判斷金額相互間虛無假設後以T-test了解其假設是否成立，其差異是否顯著，兩母群體之變異數是否相同，並分析比較各仲裁判斷案例的理賠率。 經過相關之交叉比對分析可得到不同的工程類別，不同的工程處以及發包金額的大小對理賠率的影響。 初步成果： 1. 北二高理賠率較高；隧道較橋樑工程為高。 2. 國工局仲裁案並不一定 “輸”。 3. 理賠率總平均約為31%，所以大於31%以上才算輸。 建議：將來國工局應該趨向於以行政院公共工程委員會調處為解決爭議主軸，建議不仿以31%為底限，超過則不接受調處。Abstract Due to huge cost, long duration, work area problem, and complex construction methods, the expressway projects inevitably have many disputes between the contractors and the clients during construction. In the local system, when the agreements of dispute solution are not reached, they can go for conciliations, arbitrations, or lawsuits. According to the contract between The National Expressway Engineering Bureau (NEEB) and the contractor, if they both are pleased, either of them can call arbitration for any dispute. The NEEB has experienced over 100 cases of arbitration since 1990. More than 20 other cases are still proceeding right now. This study collected 88 samples among the arbitration cases mentioned above. The arbitrations in each engineering division of NEEB were compared. Using the software of Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS), this study checks nill hypothesis of bid prices, claim money amounts, and the final money amounts. The claim-compensation ratios of arbitration were analysis by T-test, significant level, and their variables. After cross comparison, claim-compensation ratios showed to be influent by different category of project, different engineering division, and different law office. The preliminary conclusions was 1. The claim-compensation ratio in Third Expressway project is higher than the other projects in NEEB. The tunnel projects are higher than the bridge projects. 2. The arbitrations in NEEB are not certainly lose. 3. The “lose” means if the claim-compensation ratio is higher than the average of 31%. This study recommends that NEEB choose conciliation in Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan to be the first priority to solve their dispute. NEEB should accept the conciliation if the claim-compensation ratio is lower than 31%, or reject the conciliation if it is higher than 31%.目錄 第一章緒論 1.1研究動機………………………………………………………………………1 1.1.1國道新建工程成立及國道高速公路建設工程之特性……………………1 1.1.2國道高速公路建設工程之爭議……………………………………………1 1.1.3探討主題……………………………………………………………………2 1.2研究目的………………………………………………………………………3 1.3研究範圍………………………………………………………………………3 1.4研究方法………………………………………………………………………3 第二章文獻回顧 2.1國工局仲裁判斷書案例蒐集統計……………………………………………5 2.2工程的定義……………………………………………………………………5 2.3國道新建工程履約爭議較易發生的原因……………………………………5 2.4 國道新建工程仲裁機制………………………………………………………6 2.5國工局仲裁流程………………………………………………………………6 2.6工程仲裁之優缺點……………………………………………………………9 2.7國工局契約内容………………………………………………………………11 2.8公共工程委員會的契約文件內容……………………………………………11 2.9工程契約相關文書相抵觸時優先順序………………………………………12 2.10仲裁、調解及法院裁判收費比較……………………………………………12 第三章研究方法 3.1資料來源………………………………………………………………………14 3.2統計軟體析……………………………………………………………………14 3.3均數檢定………………………………………………………………………14 3.4獨立樣本T檢定………………………………………………………………15 第四章案例介紹 4.1各工程別統計分析……………………………………………………………27 4.1.1工程別描述性統計…………………………………………………………27 4.2資料來源………………………………………………………………………28 第五章研究結果 5.1研究範圍說明…………………………………………………………………42 5.2各處別仲裁案件統計分析……………………………………………………42 5.3發包金額求償金額仲裁判斷金額實付百分比區處別差異分析……………46 5.4各工程別統計分析……………………………………………………………51 5.4.1工程別描述性統計…………………………………………………………51 5.4.2發包金額求償金額仲裁判斷金額實付百分比工程別差異分析…………52 第六章結論及建議 6.1結論……………………………………………………………………………57 6.2建議……………………………………………………………………………58 6.3後續研究建……………………………………………………………………592344760 bytesapplication/pdfen-US仲裁理賠率均數檢定(T-test)ArbitrationClaim-compensation ratioT-testthesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/50270/1/ntu-96-P93521713-1.pdf