2005-08-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/705423摘要：「刑事被告享有詰問證人之權利，乃具普世價值之基本人權」！ 上開簡潔有力的引言，出自於二○○四年七月作成的我國大法官釋字第五八二號解釋。本號解釋肇因於徐自強案，而該案裁判猶如蘇建和案等爭議裁判，將共犯／共同被告之自白，採為不利被告本人之有罪裁判基礎，因而引發一連串的共犯／共同被告的證人地位問題。爭議迄今未止。 上開大法官解釋，除我國憲法及法律外，也從美、日、德各國憲法、法律及《歐洲人權公約》等國際人權公約，論述刑事被告詰問（不利）證人之權利，乃超越法系與訴訟構造差異的「普世價值之基本人權」。由此可知，本號解釋已清楚認知，處理普世人權的具體司法實踐，要放大到內國法以外的視野。其實，本身即是跨國性司法實踐的歐洲人權法院之判例法，在此提供了一個觀察基點，其中有些案例，竟然和遠在千里之外的我國系爭案例有諸多雷同之處（如Isgr&ograve;、Ferrantelli及Barber&agrave;等三案），該院如何超越法系與內國訴訟構造差異而發展並實踐普世人權，對於歷史上繼受西方法制與人權基準的我國法而言，別具意義。 然而，確立「刑事被告享有詰問（不利）證人之普世權利」這個命題，卻只是問題的<br> Abstract: In criminal proceedings, it is among basic international human rights crossing legal systems and national boundaries that the accused has the right to be confronted with the witness against him. In our country the accused is also entitled to such a right. However, the judicial realization of the right of confrontation faces many problems waiting for us to overcome. For example, how do we define “hostile witnesses”? Can a conspirator or co-defendant be a “hostile witness”? What is the substantial essence of confrontation? Under what conditions do we recognize its exceptions? These are some questions that national laws of other countries, the law of international human rights, the law of Taiwan, the European Convention on Human Rights, Taiwanese Grand Justices, European Court of Human Rights all face in common. This study starts from the discussion about the confrontation clause of the European Convention on Human Rights, and analyses the judgments of European Court of Human Rights. Then this study research how the right of confrontation has developed into an international human right that crosses legal systems and surpasses Pan-European boundaries, and comments its merits and defects. Finally, this study will come back to its local foothold, and briefly comments the possible elucidation and benefits it will bring to the future development of the law of our country. In conclusion, this study will deal with the problems of accused’s rights throughout the criminal proceedings. This study also attempts to offer some alternative viewpoints for relevant legislation in Taiwan. Meanwhile, through taking a panoramic view of Case-Law of European Court of Human Rights, this study includes some articles, and is trying to make efforts to expand the field of Taiwan’s international criminal law studies.對質詰問不利證人歐洲人權公約歐洲人權法院confrontationexamination of witnesshostile witnessEuropean Convention on Human RightsEuropean Court of Human Rights