Upper endoscope for colonoscopy: Evidence is still too sparse to utilize [1]

TSUNG-CHUN LEEHAN-MO CHIUYI-CHIA LEEHSIU-PO WANGHuang S.-P.MING-SHIANG WULin J.-T.2021-01-152021-01-1520070002-9270https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33947681303&doi=10.1111%2fj.1572-0241.2007.01090_1.x&partnerID=40&md5=1798299d51fd55e99cf6dd0ac8d67d99https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/541135[SDGs]SDG3abdominal pain; body mass; cancer screening; colon stenosis; colonoscope; colonoscopy; colorectal adenoma; colorectal cancer; endoscope; human; letter; multivariate logistic regression analysis; priority journal; sex difference; Body Mass Index; Cecum; Colonoscopes; Colonoscopy; Endoscopes; Female; Humans; Intestinal Polyps; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Patient Acceptance of Health CareUpper endoscope for colonoscopy: Evidence is still too sparse to utilize [1]letter10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01090_1.x173974142-s2.0-33947681303