2015-01-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/706680摘要：明中葉後，學術氛圍日漸遞變，經世致用的趨向帶動了性學、氣學、意學、經學等多元發展，鋪設出明清交接之際學風轉換的諸多思想軌道。於劉蕺山（1578-1645）誠意慎獨說提出之前，陽明後學在「意」的內涵詮釋上也已有所不同，此變化軸線可從泰州王棟( 1503-1581 )、江右王時槐( 1522-1605 )等人的新詮，推原至浙中黃綰（1480-1554）評議楊簡( 1141-1226 )學說時對於「意」的重新思索。本計劃選擇黃綰對楊簡「不起意」說的評騭為論題，乃因他的意學七項內容綱領主要是在評判過程中所提揭。本文目的不在說明評判所牽涉到的理論效應問題，而是從詮釋學的角度切入，探討黃綰對楊簡「意」的理解從脫離再現性解釋到擴大性解讀間形成空位之因及其填補方式，進而審視思潮走向與其詮釋向度、評判視域、致思歸向的互涉層面，以辨析陽明後學於「意」概念轉變中所蘊涵的思維論域及其關涉的義理重整。 楊簡思想復甦於王學興盛之際，其說於心意關係的辯證是否足以架構起工夫進路，成為陽明後學爭鋒相對的議題。黃綰本為陽明摯友，後改執弟子禮，晚年因不滿流弊轉而對王學有諸多省思，為學歷程可謂推衍於王學&#34861;起、分化以至流弊的見證與探究上。楊簡「不起意」說為何會進入黃綰的視域？他為何對「意」的判定擴大為較論，並提出有別於王學定位的七項內涵支架？「意」在內容規定、義理延展、解讀面向上，表現出哪些有別以往的新詮釋？對晚明思想又有哪些影響向度？本計畫即是試圖處理此問題。 <br> Abstract: After mid Ming dynasty, the troubled, corruption-riddled and diverted situation caused the transition of academic theories toward practical purposes such as Study of Character, Study of Qi, Study of Consciousness, Study of Confucian classics, etc. As time transferred from Ming to Qing dynasty, many studies developed into different tracks and so was the Study of Consciousness. Before Liu Ji-shan brought up his theory of Sincerity and Behaving in Private Life, the interpretation of "Consciousness" in Post-Yangmingism had changed. The stream traced back to the new interpretation of Wang Yi-an, Wang Tang-nan and the original commentary of Huang Wan towards Yang Jian with the review of "Intension". This research choose Huang Wan`s commentary towards Yang Jian`s "Without Intension" Theory as the case, not for the process how he determined Yang`s theory and the related effect, but to examine the hermeneutic dimensionality, critical vision and thought origin of Huang Wan`s viewpoint among thoughts of that era, and to discriminate the reform of argumentation, universe of discourse and value in Neo-Confucianism for the Transition of "Consciousness" in Post-Yangmingism. Revived with Yangmingism, Yang Jian`s thought investigated the relationship between heart and consciousness. Post-Yangmingism argued if Yang`s theory was reasonable enough to be the developed practice. Further, why it caused the high attention of Huang Wan? Huang was a good friend and later a pupil of Wang Yangming, yet in his old age reexamined Yangmingism due to the corrupted era, then became a witness and researcher of how Yangmingism spawned, divided and crushed. On what standard did Huang made his comment? What was the determination of content, development of argumentation, and interpretation for "Intension "? How came Huang raised different opinions with Wang Yangming and the effect for thoughts in late Ming? This research is to probe into the above questions.黃綰久庵楊簡意陽明後學Huang WanJiu-anYang JianconsciousnessPost-Yangmingism