2008-08-012024-05-13https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/652174摘要：本計畫乃延續本人過去對規範性之規範縫隙理論定位的研究。簡要地說，規範形構(normative configuration)是透過規範表述所形成的體制設計及其要素。法律、道德、倫理，乃至於傳統中國的禮，都是規範形構的型態之一。透過規範理論的進展，我們對於各類規範形構之邏輯、語言或法理論性質，都有了更多的瞭解。但是迄今為止，並沒有學者嘗試以一個概括的上位概念來掌握，並進而發展更完備的理論來解析相關的問題。本計畫將以三個理論發展史的線索（Schmitt的nomos（範域）理論；批判理論之論述法媒介論；基進法理論之生命權力論），配合三個關鍵的（尤其在亞洲新興民主國家或後殖民國家條件下）憲政法理學問題意識（憲法基進要素論；憲法維護論；基本權理論）為背景架構，嘗試以「合法性」概念，以及被基進理論宣告終結的憲政主義之「憲政佈建」為探討重點，進行對現代性∕後現代性下之規範形構理論的初步研究。其具體的實施構想是，第一年的研究，以Schmitt對合法性之批判，以及其由體制與秩序概念發展到強調nomos概念的理論發展為重點；第二年則以批判理論對憲政主義的理論重構，與基進理論─主要是Negri─對憲政主義之憲政佈建論為重點；第三年則綜合前述的研究，進而檢討憲法維護此一重要問題。<br> Abstract: This project is a continuing study of my research of the normativity as normative gap in the past few years. The normative configuration means, roughly speaking, the institutions or their elements formed by normative expressions. Law, morality, ethos, and ‘Li’ in the traditional China are all paradigmatic examples of normative configuration. Thanks to the progress of the theory of norm, we understand now the logical, linguistics, and the legal theoretical characters of various normative configurations much better than before. However, thus far there is no one trying to develop a general concept for all those configurations by which we can deepen our understanding of relevant questions. Taking three key problems in the constitutional jurisprudence: the radical elements in constitution, the protection of constitutional order, and the theory of basic rights, as the background, I will try to trace three developing tracks of theorizing: Carl Schmitt’s theory of Nomos, law as discursive media in the critical theory, and the bio-political theory of power in the radical legal theory, and then based on them to do some basic researches to the theory of normative configuration. Particularly, the concept of ‘legality’ and the ‘constitutional dispositive’, which is used to describe the legal framework of 20th century constitutionalism and whose age is proclaimed to be over by radical legal theorists, would be the primary targets of this study. The plan of the way I am going to undertake this research is as follows: The developing trace of Schmittian theory from the Institution, konkrete Ordnung to Nomos, and his critique on the legality will be studied in the first year; in the second, I will focus on the critical reconstruction as well as the radical critique and new agenda of the constitutional dispositive; then the important problem of the protection of the constitutional order will be discussed within the aforementioned context in the third year.合法性憲政佈建規範形構規範性規範縫隙施密特範域體制具體秩序法之論述理論基進法理論憲政主義生命權力憲政法理學legalityconstitutional dispositivenormative configurationnormativitynormative gapSchmittNomosinstitutionkonkrete Ordnungdiscourse theory of lawradical legal theoryconstitutionalismbio-powerconstitutionalism