2009-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/680859摘要：本計畫共有三個工作項目：(1)整理羅蒂及高達美詮釋學的預設，(2)考察它們如何根據其預設建立哲學內容，和(3)對它們作出批判。 第一個項目是針對羅蒂和高達美的哲學體系進行後設的理解(meta-understanding)，這是探討它們的預設，檢討其在邏輯上的一致性問題。 相同的預設不一定發展出相同的哲學內容，因為在不同的條件下，會發展出不同的哲學體系。所以，要檢討一個哲學體系，必須考察這些條件。這是本計畫第二個工作項目。完成這個項目可以更全面地理解羅蒂和高達美的哲學。 第三個項目是批判性的。一個完整的哲學思考過程不僅是描述的，它必須也是批判的。我稱羅蒂的哲學為「好奇的詮釋學(hermeneutics of curiosity)」，而高達美的哲學為「真理的詮釋學(hermeneutics of truth)。」我認為後者才是詮釋學的合理發展。<br> Abstract: This project is divided into three parts: 1. An exposition of the philosophical presuppositions in both Rorty’s and Gadamer’s hermeneutics. 2. How they develop their philosophical systems in terms of their presuppositions? 3. A critique on their philosophies. The first part of this project is a meta-understanding of Gadamer and Rorty, by which the presuppositions of their philosophies are illuminated, and the problem of their logical consistency discussed. The second part deals with the conditions under which their philosophies develop. The third part is a critique on their hermeneutics. I call the philosophy of Rorty “the hermeneutics of curiosity,” and that of Gadamer “the hermeneutics of truth.” I point out that the latter hermeneutics will have a better impact upon human civilization.高達美羅蒂詮釋學真理GadamerRortyHermeneuticsTruth