臺灣大學: 政治學研究所石之瑜吳宗翰Wu, Tsung-HanTsung-HanWu2013-03-292018-06-282013-03-292018-06-282010http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/254509本文旨探討對西藏的研究當中透露關於中國的認識，並選取印度與澳大利亞作為考察對象。本研究以文本分析法、比較文獻法、歷史分析法與訪談法完成，處理之問題意識有三項：一、從印度以及澳大利亞兩國的英語文獻中整理歸納關於西藏問題研究的狀況，以及其中國認識；二、比較這兩個時空條件互異下的雙方視野，並推測其中原因；三、將印澳學界的西藏問題研究與其各自的中國研究對照，釐清其西藏問題研究與中國研究的關係。 經由對各面向的綜合考察，本研究認為受到在地理上與中藏距離的差異，以及本國歷史的發展經驗與和中藏來往經驗等共同影響，印度在論述上視西藏幾具有等同於印中地位的國家主體性，而澳洲則視西藏為中國內部具備地方主體性的特質。文獻當中透露出存在於印、澳兩地認識中國的角度各有三種：印度分別是體系視野、文明視野與行動視野；澳洲則分別為國協視野、文明視野與行動視野。 整體言之，本研究認為印度學界與澳大利亞學界的情形所帶給中國研究的啟示是：印度早已在歷史的經驗中形成對中國的認知，其對西藏的研究使其得以透過西藏觀察中國（See China through Tibet）；而澳洲則視中國為一個具多元主體構成的國家，其是在西藏研究當中發現中國（See China in Tibet）。This dissertation aims to research the ‘image of China’ from Indian and Australian studies viz-á-viz the Tibet issue. This dissertation is based on historical analysis and qualitative interviews, and focuses on the following subjects: firstly, analysing the Tibet issue research and ‘image of China’ in Indian and Australian literatures; secondly, comparing and explaining the similiarities and differences; and thirdly, understanding the interrelations between the China Studies and Tibet Issue Studies of the two countries. Overall, we can panoramically examine how India and Australia consider Tibet and China. What the author found was that Indian academia perceives Tibet as an individual subject like China and India, wheres Australian academia regards Tibet as a local subject in China. Furthermore, there are three ‘images of China’ from Indian scholars: the perspectives of international system, of civilizational politics, and of interrelational context. There are also ‘three images of China’ from Australian scholars: regarding China as a commonwealth, examining the relations between the Chinese state and ethnicities, and focusing on the local characteristics. The reasons can be concluded that the geological distance from Tibet and China, bilateral contacts with them in history and self-development experience of India and Australia. All in all, the inspirations can be brought to the Sinology from Indian and Australian on Tibet issue studies. India mainly held as ‘See China through Tibet’ as she forms the perception toward China by its history experience. Australia regards China as a state of multiple entities and she ‘Sees China in Tibet’.4159668 bytesapplication/pdfen-US西藏西藏研究西藏問題中國觀印度中國學澳洲中國學TibetTibetan StudyTibet Issueimage of ChinaIndian SinologyAustralian Sinologyhttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/254509/1/ntu-99-R97322028-1.pdf