Chang W.-H.Tseng H.-C.Chao T.-K.Hsu C.-J.TIEN-CHEN LIU2020-03-092020-03-0920080194-5998https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-43949105806&doi=10.1016%2fj.otohns.2008.02.012&partnerID=40&md5=9ecbaf2b4f762574a2d9370f16a2e769https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/474500Objective: To evaluate speech performance and subjective outcomes for older individuals who have hearing impairment and use digital hearing aids. The outcomes between young and old elderly users were compared. Study Design: Prospective. Subjects and Methods: Fifty-nine patients with hearing loss fitted with digital hearing aids were included. They were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 32 subjects aged 65 to 80 years, whereas group B had 27 subjects older than 80 years. Speech performance and subjective outcomes were measured 4 months after fitting of hearing aids. Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), satisfaction, and usage questionnaires were used as subjective assessments. Results: Improvements in speech performance were not significantly different between these two groups. There were no statistical differences in terms of HHIE-S score reduction, satisfaction rate, daily usage time, and COSI scores between both groups. Conclusion: Age by itself is not a limiting factor for older patients with hearing impairment to benefit from digital hearing aids. ? 2008 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.[SDGs]SDG3adult; aged; article; audiometry; controlled study; elderly care; hearing aid; hearing impairment; human; major clinical study; outcome assessment; patient satisfaction; questionnaire; rating scale; scoring system; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Audiometry, Speech; Cohort Studies; Equipment Design; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss, Bilateral; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Humans; Patient Satisfaction; Treatment OutcomeMeasurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: Comparison between young and old elderlyjournal article10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.012185038442-s2.0-43949105806