葉仲基臺灣大學：生物產業機電工程學研究所劉俊傳Liu, Chun-ChuanChun-ChuanLiu2007-11-262018-07-102007-11-262018-07-102004http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/52905摘要 本研究乃在探討於住宅區內（或緊鄰學校）設置捷運通風口對周遭環境之空氣品質、噪音與振動等等之影響，希望藉由本研究能做有系統之探討，並依其研究結果以作為對周邊環境品質之影響謀求對策與方案。 研究過程中，本研究視通風口之排氣為污染源，針對通風口所排放氣體之TSP、PM10、PM2.5、CO、NO2、SO2、Pb等濃度與大氣測站所蒐集之環境濃度比較，以瞭解通風口排放之氣體其污染濃度與大氣環境之關係。在振動噪音方面，於通風井排氣口處設置監測儀器以瞭解來自通風口之振動與噪音污染程度，並蒐集鄰近通風口之環境振動與噪音量，釐清通風口週界處之噪音與振動的主要污染源。 由監測實驗中發現：在空氣污染方面，通風口所排放之污染氣體濃度，均在管制範圍之內，且與大氣中污染物濃度呈正相關行為，通風口所排放之污染氣體濃度受外界環境影響甚鉅。對於噪音與振動污染，通風口週界之道路交通所產生的噪音量與振動污染遠大於通風井所產生者，在夜間捷運列車停駛狀態下，所錄製的通風口週界環境之噪音量已超過管制標準。通風井之振動污染小於管制標準（ISO 2631）。對於站內、外懸浮微粒的濃度情形，監測中的公館捷運站與永安市場捷運站之站內的懸浮微粒濃度在捷運營運的時間裡，小時平均濃度均大於管制標準，但日平均濃度在管制範圍之內。In this study, it is mainly aimed at investigating the impact of the MRT ventilation outlets to the environment, especially for those systems close to residential areas / schools. During the research, outlets of ventilation shaft were regarded as the pollution source. For better understanding, the exhaust air of the MRT ventilation outlets, such as dust particle concentrations (including TSP, PM10, PM2.5), Carbon monoxide (CO), Sulfur dioxide (SO2), were collected and compared with the surrounding data from EPA. In the case of vibration and noise quality of these shafts, exhaust outlets were still regarded as the source of the pollutions. Vibration and noise of the soundings near to those shafts were considered and compared to those of ventilation shaft outlets to distinguish the real pollution source. According to the results: the air qualities of all the six ventilation shaft outlets were under the standard of EPA. And the air qualities of ventilation shafts were affected with the surroundings. Vibration and noise of surroundings contributed much more than those of ventilation shafts. As to the outside and inside dust particle concentrations of GongGuan and Yongan Market stations, the air qualities (average concentration per hour) during the MRT business hours were exceeding the values specified by the standard of EPA, but 24-hr average concentrations were both under.中文摘要………………………………………………ii 英文摘要………………………………………………iii 目錄……………………………………………………iv 圖目錄…………………………………………………vi 表目錄…………………………………………………x 第一章 緒論………………………………………1 1.1 前言………………………………………………1 1.2 研究目的…………………………………………2 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………3 2.1 捷運通風井空氣品質污染相關規定 ……………3 2.2 捷運通風井噪音污染相關規定 …………………6 2.3 捷運通風井振動污染相關規定 …………………13 2.4 文獻回顧 …………………………………………15 第三章 理論分析……………………………………19 3.1 通風井對週界環境之空氣污染 …………………19 3.2 通風井之噪音污染 ………………………………22 3.3 通風井之振動污染 ………………………………36 第四章 捷運通風井之污染現況監測………………40 4.1 研究內容與範圍……………………………………40 4.2 研究方法與過程……………………………………42 第五章 實驗結果與討論……………………………47 5.1 通風井空氣品質監測………………………………47 5.2 通風井噪音監測……………………………………94 5.3 通風井振動監測……………………………………110 第六章 結論與建議…………………………………119 6.1 結論…………………………………………………119 6.2 建議…………………………………………………123 參考文獻…………………………………………………126 附錄一 環境監測儀器說明 ……………………………128 附錄二 風速衰減 ………………………………………135 附錄三 空氣品質原始數據 ……………………………137 附錄四 噪音監測原始數據 ……………………………149 附錄五 振動監測原始數據分析報表 …………………188 附錄六 通風井之頻譜特性 …………………………194 附錄七 站內與站外懸浮微粒濃度之比較…………2012646298 bytesapplication/pdfen-US振動空氣品質噪音捷運通風口NoiseMRTVentilation shaftVibrationAir qualitythesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/52905/1/ntu-93-R89631013-1.pdf