莊正民2006-07-262018-06-292006-07-262018-06-291999http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/16994本研究依據交易成本理論和知識 基礎理論探討企業進行國際合作時， 如何考量企業本身技術條件、合作資 源特性、與產業特質等因素，選擇最 適當的國際合作型式，如：委託製造、 技術合作、及合資協議，來達成國際 合作的目的。交易成本理論與知識基 礎理論分別提供了不同的思維邏輯， 來解釋進入策略或合作型式選擇的決 策。本研究首先整理及評析相關文 獻，發展研究架構與研究假設，最後 並以台灣地區參與國際合作的企業為 樣本，進行深度訪談及問卷調查，來 驗證相關之研究假設，以說明及比較 這兩個學派對本研究問題的解釋能 力。實證結果顯示，交易成本理論的 解釋能力優於知識基礎理論，而綜合 兩個理論的模型其解釋能力也略為提 高，顯示兩個理論具有互補關係。This research attempts to compare and contrast the similarities and differences of transaction costs economics and knowledge-based view towards the determinants and underlying logics explaining the choice of international collaboration modes. Following the literature review and critiques, this research is to develop a conceptual framework as well as various research hypotheses, and by using Taiwanese firms having experiences in international collaboration as sample, to conduct an empirical research to test those hypotheses and compare how the explanatory power of transaction costs economics and knowledge-based views differ. It is evidenced that while transaction costs theory possesses a better explanatory power than knowledge-based view, the integrated model combining these two strands explains the research question best, showing a complementary rather than substituting relationship between them.application/pdf29484 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW國立臺灣大學國際企業學系暨研究所reporthttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/16994/1/882416H002029.pdf