SHIE-MING PENGWang YChen C.‐KLee J.‐YLiaw D.‐S.2022-12-142022-12-14198600094536https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77951189554&doi=10.1002%2fjccs.198600003&partnerID=40&md5=0c34dcdcd2f226e8ae079d073e7aaeddhttps://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/626364Crystal and molecular structures of the planar neutral ligand, C26H16N8, and the four isomorphous five‐coordinated metal complexes, [M(C26H16N8)(H2O)], M = Mn(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), have been determined from three‐dimensional X‐ray diffraction data. The free ligand hpH2, C26H16N8, belongs to the P 21/c space group with Z=2, a=4.142(3), b=23.736(6), c=10.338(3) Ä, β=94.66(6)°. The metal complexes monohydrate Mhp‐H2O all belong to the orthorhombic Pcab space group with Z=8. The dimensions are roughly 8.8×19.3×23.7 Å3. In each structure, the macrocyclic ligand has an almost planar conformation which differs from the saddle shaped ligand hydrate (hpH2·H2O) and the nickel complex [Nihp]5. The distances from the center of the macrocyclic ring to the nitrogen atom of the free ligand are 1.907(6) and 2.245(6)Å. The coordination geometry in these four complexes is square pyramidal with a water molecule as an axial ligand. The bond distances of M(II)‐O(H2O), M(II)‐N1 (imine), M(II)‐N3 (pyridine) are: 2.19(1), 2.00(2), 2.27(2)Å respectively for the manganese complex; 2.08(1), 1.97(1), 2.23(1)Å for the cobalt complex; 2.33(1), 1.92(3), 2.18(1)Å for the copper complex; 2.110(5), 1.964(6), 2.252(6)Å for the zinc complex. The variation of metal‐ligand distances can be correlated to the metal d orbital occupancy. A comparison with similar ligands will be presented. Copyright © 1986 The Chemical Society Located in Taipei & Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germanycobalt; copper; Crystal structure; hemiporphyrazine; macrocyclic ligand and manganese; zinc complexesjournal article10.1002/jccs.1986000032-s2.0-77951189554