DANIEL FU-CHANG TSAIChen D.-S.2020-02-262020-02-2620031021-7770https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0242299684&doi=10.1159%2f000073521&partnerID=40&md5=406841ff9b91c2660c0443c07dd27d95https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/464927In this paper, by examining the idea of a 'Hippocratic Oath for scientists', promoted by Sir Joseph Rotblat, oaths for medical professionals and scientists and the definitions and relationships of different moral norms such as oaths, codes and guidelines, we propose an oath for bioscientists with justifications based on professional and organizational ethics. Copyright ? 2003 National Science Council, ROC and S. Karger AG, Basel.English[SDGs]SDG3ethics; human; justice; medical personnel; medical profession; morality; organization; practice guideline; priority journal; review; science; article; institutional ethics; medical ethics; personnel; research ethics; social behavior; health care; health care personnel; medical education; medical practice; medical school; medical student; patient care; science; welfare; Codes of Ethics; Ethics, Institutional; Ethics, Professional; Ethics, Research; Humans; Morals; Research Personnel; Social Responsibilityreview10.1159/000073521145764582-s2.0-0242299684