Tsou, Po-YangPo-YangTsouWang, Yu-HsunYu-HsunWangMa, Yu-KunYu-KunMaDeanehan, Julia KJulia KDeanehanGillon, JasonJasonGillonChou, Eric HEric HChouHsu, Tzu-ChunTzu-ChunHsuHuang, Yuan-ChunYuan-ChunHuangLin, JudyJudyLinCHIEN-CHANG LEE2019-09-232019-09-232019-090735-6757https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/424823It is unclear whether point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by emergency medicine physicians is as accurate as radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS). We aim to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for intussusception and to compare the performance between POCUS and RADUS.enDiagnostic accuracy; Intussusception; Meta-analysis; Point-of-care ultrasound[SDGs]SDG3clinical competence; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic test accuracy study; echography; emergency physician; evidence based medicine; human; image analysis; intermethod comparison; intestinal intussusception; meta analysis; peer review; point of care testing; priority journal; publication bias; qualitative research; quantitative study; radiologist; radiology performed ultrasound; Review; sensitivity and specificity; systematic review; adolescent; area under the curve; child; echography; female; hospital emergency service; infant; intussusception; male; newborn; point of care system; predictive value; preschool child; prospective study; retrospective study; Adolescent; Area Under Curve; Child; Child, Preschool; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intussusception; Male; Point-of-Care Systems; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; UltrasonographyAccuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and radiology-performed ultrasound for intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysisjournal articlehttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/8506684696810.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.006311823602-s2.0-85066846968WOS:000482211500031https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85066846968