2001-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/689146摘要：「主導曲線」原本是個由陶瓷燒結理論所推導出來的數學模型，可以很有效的分析與預測陶瓷粉體之固態燒結過程，因此其應用範圍應該只侷限在此模型所假設的條件下。然而經過初步的分析發現，主導曲線也能成功應用在解釋成油過程的模擬與預測方面。因此雖然在直觀上很難看出來關連性，但此模型的實質內涵有可能與基本反應動力方程式類似，甚至在數據分析的計算方面還要更為容易。 本計畫的主要目的就是要針對此令人疑惑的基礎科學問題從理論推導與實驗設計兩方面來做一更仔細且深入的研究。預期將能回答一些重要的問題，諸如為什麼一個從材料燒結製程（高溫短時間）所發展出來的數學模型，竟然也可以運用在低溫長時間的地質成油過程之模擬？這是不是因為此模型本身即代表一非常基礎的一般反應方程式？或者是此模型與化學反應方程式等效（相同方程式的不同形式）？本研究的成果有可能會成為在跨領域反應動力學上的重大發現。 <br> Abstract: Master curve (MC) model was a newly developed sintering model, which can adequately predict the density variations of ceramic compacts throughout the whole sintering process. The assumptions adopted by the model during its derivation should have set a rigid limitation on the conditions under which the model is applicable. However, we have curiously found that the model can be used successfully to analyze the experimental data of oil generation (kerogen conversion). This may indicate that the model is, in fact, closely related to basic kinetics equations, although it’s not obvious from the appearances. We propose here to study this puzzling problem in details. From carrying out both theoretical studies and special designed experiments, we expect to answer several important questions, such as why a mathematical model derived from sintering (a process of high temperature and short time) can be used to interpret the data form kerogen conversion (a process of low temperature and long time)? Is the model itself representing a different type of basic kinetic equation? Or, is it that the model is equivalent to “kinetic equations, “ but in a different form? The results of this work may become an important discovery in the multi-discipline reaction kinetics.主導曲線反應動力學成油過程模擬master curvereaction kineticsoil generationsimulation