SHANG-CHIN HUANGJA-DER LIANGSHIH-JER HSUTZU-CHAN HONGHUNG-CHIH YANGJIA-HORNG KAO2022-02-162022-02-162021-042287-2728https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/594647The core needle biopsy (CNB), fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and touch imprint cytology (TIC) are commonly used tools for the diagnosis of hepatic malignancies. However, little is known about the benefits and criteria for selecting appropriate technique among them in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of ultrasound-guided CNB, FNAC, TIC as well as combinations for the diagnosis of hepatic malignancies, and to determine the factors associated with better sensitivity in each technique.enBiopsy; Cytology; Histology; Liver cancer; Ultrasonography[SDGs]SDG3adult; Article; biopsy technique; comparative study; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; female; human; human tissue; liver cancer; liver injury; lung cancer; major clinical study; male; metastasis; middle aged; needle biopsy; sensitivity and specificity; touch imprint cytology; ultrasound; ultrasound guided fine needle aspirationDirect comparison of biopsy techniques for hepatic malignanciesjournal article10.3350/cmh.2020.0301333172392-s2.0-85104667047WOS:000637344100011https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/561653