2019-04-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/694589摘要：由於私有化和權力下放後，地方政府尤其重視非營利部門的角色與發展 (Gronbjerg，2002）。近年來在台灣，長照政策允許非營利和營利組織同時競爭政 府合同與執行政策，已引起學者對非營利組織在提供社會服務中的作用的關注。長 照 2.0假設當地服務提供者具備足夠能力實施政策。而這些提供者由政府，非營利 組織和營利性組織組成，各部門得共同努力來完成政策目標。因此，了解政府和私 營部門 如何影響非營利組織的發展為之重要。 我們觀察到了主要文獻已從部門競爭轉變到治理模式的關注。之前的研究提出了一 個綜合框架（DiMaggio 2006），其中包括市場失靈和行業組織理論，政府失靈和 相互依賴理論，以及政治和歷史方法。然而，由於缺乏適當數據，這些理論在台灣 很少被全面的研究與檢視（Kuan和Wong，2010）。我們將在建構一個獨特的數 據庫，利用勞動保險和普查數據，以檢驗影響非營利組織分配和發展的因素。更具 體地說，我們將測試商業增長（DiMaggio 2006），私人捐贈（M atsunaga＆Yamauchi 2004），社區多樣性（Corbin 1999; Paalberg＆Gen2008），政府規模（Matsunaga＆Yamauchi 2004），政府撥款 （Salamon＆Anheier） 2000）和社區特徵（如Gronbjerg＆Paarlberg 2000）影 響台灣非營利組織的分佈和發展。根據這三種面向的理論來測試非營利組織分配和 發展，除了能驗證理論，並能提供政策工具。<br> Abstract: The nonprofit sector has gained recognition at local governments because of privatization and devolution (Gronbjerg 2002). Recently, long-term care policy, as part of recent welfare reform in Taiwan allowing both nonprofit and for-profit service organizations to compete for government contracts, has raised attention about the role of nonprofit in the provision of social services. An important assumption for the development of community care under the Long-term Care Services Act is that local community providers have a provision system with sufficient capacity to implement the policy and perform the services. The effectiveness of these policies heavily relies on the local social service providers, which are composed of government, nonprofit and private providers. Therefore, it is important to understand the factors that influence the development and distribution of nonprofits in the local communities where government and private are present in a joint effort to provide social and health service provision. Based on an initial systematic review, we reveal a paradigm shift from focusing on sectoral competition to governance. Previous studies show that nonprofit development is influenced by the growth of for-profits, service nature, and policy/economic factors (Corbin 1999; DiMaggio 2006; Gronbjerg & Paarlberg 2000; Lecy & VanSlyke 2011; Luksetich 2008; Matsunaga & Yamauchi 2004; Salamon & Anheier 2000; Saxton & Benson 2005), and further proposes a comprehensive framework (DiMaggio 2006) that incorporates market failure and industrial-organization approaches, government failure and interdependency approaches, and political and historical approaches. However, this dynamic has been little studied in Taiwan due to a lack of appropriate data for testing the developed theories (Kuan and Wong 2010).非營利跨部門社會服務治理nonprofitintersectorsocial servicesgovernance