國立臺灣大學歷史學系蔡天怡2006-12-202018-05-292006-12-202018-05-292005-03http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/2006121215550533｢別史｣是史部類例中較晚出現的，在史部的地位亦相當模糊。雖然可以｢上不至於正史，下不至於雜史｣概括說明，卻不易清楚界定其範圍。歷來書目設有別史類者，更是屈指可數。《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》是近代兩部重要的書目，其史部皆有別史一類。本文乃以此二書目為主，比較其別史類所收圖分類之異同，希望有助於釐清別史之特性。The utilization of Bie-shi(alternative histories) as a class in traditional historical classification began in Sung Dynasty. Bie-shi is usually defined as 'a category which is not as formal as Zheng-shi(Official Dynastic Histories), nut not as casual as Za-shi(Miscellaneous histories).' Still, the meaning and coverage of Bie-shi is not quite clear and well-established. It was not a common category employed in traditional historical classification schemes either. Shu-mu Da-wen(Answers to Inquiries into Bibliography) and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu(Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection) are two important bibliographies in Qing Dynasty. They both employed Bie-shi as a category to classify related woeks. This study attempts to compare and analyze the historical works that were classified in Bie-shi category of these two bibliographies. The goal is to provide a clearer picture about the characteristics of Bie-shi.application/pdf9654802 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW書目問答四庫全書總目別史類史部分類Shu-mu Da-wen(Ansers to Inquiries into Bibliography)Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu(Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection)the Alternative Histories(bie-shi)the Historiography categoriesjournal articlehttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/2006121215550533/1/11600181834261541164648.pdf