2019-01-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/686992摘要：本計畫擬擴大「荀子學」的研究視野，延伸於日韓荀子學，日本荀子學中有多種注本，大家如荻生徂徠、皆川淇園與豬飼敬所皆曾注《荀》，成果遠超過韓國荀子學。近世東亞儒學中一股反程朱理學的潮流亦反映於中、日、韓的荀子學，此一思想特性具有實學傾向，即重視經世、經史之學而反對形上學。本計畫擬聚焦三方面： 一、聚焦以荻生徂徠和丁茶山為主的日韓荀子學的思想特色。 二、聚焦於日韓荀子學與朱子學的互動。 三、挖掘近世東亞儒學中之荀子學的共同特色。<br> Abstract: The main stream of Tokugawa Japanese (1603-1868, 德川日本) Confucianism is anti-Zhu-Xi (朱熹, 1130-1200) school. Ogy&#363; Sorai’s (荻生徂徠, 1666-1728) interpretations of Xunzi reflects his concerns of “實學” (shixue) and his anti-metaphical interest. His book on Zunxi deserves close examinations. While the Tokugawa Confucianism tends to be against Zhu-Xi School, the Joseon Dynasty (朝鮮時代, 1392-1910) of Korean history features its creative development of Zhu Xi school. Under the overwhelming influence of Zhu Xi, Xunzi has been degraded as unorthodoxy. The main reason for the evaluation of Xunzi is his notion of “human nature is evil.” Although the main stream is against Xunzi, there are some scholars who emphasize Xunzi’s thought. Among those thinkers, Jeong Yakyong (丁若鏞, 1762-1836) is the most important and creative one. This three-years project will contain three parts: (1) to examine the main points of Ogy&#363; Sorai’s and Jeong Yakyong’s interpretations of Xunzi. (2) to explore the complicated connections between the Zhu Xi school and the interpretations of Xunzi in the Joseon Dynasty. (3) to feature the major characteristics of the interpretations of Xunzi shared by Japanese Confucianism and Korean Confucianism.荀子詮釋學德川日本朝鮮XunzihermeneuticsTokugawa JapanJoseon Korea