2015-08-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/698477摘要：在這個三年期的計畫中，我預計分析加強智慧財產權和一國貨幣政策對研發，模仿，技術累積，工資不均度和生產模式的影響。此計畫是建立在一個南北國的品質循環模型上；模型中，我們允許有國外直接投資。研發發生在已開發中國家(北國)；研發成功後，北國廠商可選擇在北國從事生產，或是藉著國外直接投資，改到南國從事生產。雖然到南國從事生產可以讓北國廠商雇用工資較低的南國勞動人力來生產，北國廠商需要面對被南國廠商模仿的風險。研發能使產品的品質更好，但是模仿會增加國外直接投資的風險。 此三年期計畫將分為三個小計畫執行。第一年的計畫中，我將引入技術累積。假設北國人具有異質性，可以選擇接受訓練，成為技術人員，並從事研發；或是選擇不接受訓練，成為非技術人員，並從事生產。智慧財產權的加強會造成南國的模仿成本增加，因此模仿強度會下降。在第一年的計畫中，我們假設研發的對象為所有產品。<br> Abstract: In this three-year project, I plan to examine how the strengthening of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection and changes in monetary policies affect innovation, imitation, skills accumulation, wage inequality, and the pattern of production. The analysis in this project is based on a North-South product-cycle model with foreign direct investment (FDI), within which innovation occurs in the North (a developed country) and Northern production firms could choose either to carry out the entire production of the goods in the North or allow the goods to be produced through FDI in the South (a developing country). Although Northern firms can save production cost by producing goods in the South, they need to face the risk of imitation. Innovation improves the quality of goods while imitation increases the risk of FDI. This three-year project is comprised by three subprojects. The analysis in the first-year subproject is based on a model with skills accumulation. Northerners are heterogeneous and can choose to become skilled workers and work in the R&D sector or remain unskilled and work in the production sector. In the first-year subproject, stronger IPR protection in the South will cause an exogenous decrease in the imitation intensity. Southern firms need to hire Southern labor in order to imitate Northern products. The strengthening of Southern IPR protection raises the cost of imitation activity. Two types of innovation are considered, innovation targeting all products and innovation targeting only imitated products.外國直接投資智慧財產法研發技術工資不均度FDIIPRR&DSkillWage inequality.