黃世孟臺灣大學：土木工程學研究所俞海齡Yu, Hai-LingHai-LingYu2007-11-252018-07-092007-11-252018-07-092004http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/50547目前大學教師宿舍在使用者已知的情況下，卻未針對大學教師的居住需求進行調查和設計。大學教師因應其職業，在居住空間中應有書房空間的需求，本研究以台灣大學為例，藉建成環境用後評估(P.O.E.)對台灣大學有眷教師宿舍中書房空間進行調查。未來本研究能有助於大學在規劃宿舍格局更貼近教師的居住需求，並求能更公平滿足教師需求的差異性。 本研究除了採用文獻和檔案的蒐集及分析，主要之研究方法是藉由深入訪談法和半結構式問卷蒐集資料，並進行質化和量化的分析。藉量化結果對研究對象的整體趨勢作架構的描述，並主要藉由質化資料探討造成需求度差異的原因和解釋整體趨勢下隱含的差異性。 本研究成果： 1.教師對書房需求的差異度會受以下因素影響The current university dorms for professors are designed without investigating the residential demands of them even if the constructors know their future users already. Because of their profession, professors should demand a study room in residence. This research takes the family dorm of National Taiwan University as an example for investigating the usage and the area of the study room by the method of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE). It will be helpful to make the plan be closer to the real demand and to satisfy the differences of satisfaction more fairly. Besides reviewing references and documents, the major method is to interview professors of National Taiwan University and to collect data by semi-structuring questionnaire. Moreover, the quantitative and qualitative methods are used to analyze the data. The quantitative method describes the whole trend of users’ demands and the factors which cause the differences of demands are discussed and described by qualitative method. The results of the research: 1. The differences of the demands are influenced by (1) age, tenure, and official rank (2) sex and the role of family (3) family factors, which include that if the spouse is also a researcher, number of family members, and the family life cycle (4) the relative position of a dorm and the campus where user teaches (5) the differences of research behaviors and information forms. 2. The results of the investigation of the 3 bedrooms and 2 living rooms in the dorm of the National Taiwan University are (1) two bedrooms and one independent study room (2) three bedrooms and the function of study room is included in living room. However, 47.1% of the interviewers hope that they can have one more room in the same size of apartment to become (1) three bedrooms and one independent study room (2) four bedrooms without a study room for study preparation or for doing research at home. There are 78.5% of the interviewers still choosing to have an independent studying room no matter if they have different levels of demands. It appears that the current dorms only designed in three bedrooms can’t satisfy the demands which are influenced by the effect of occupation and family. 3. To arrange the stipulation and procedure for assigning the dorms depends on the different demand levels of professors in order to satisfy the demands and do it more fairly.摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iii 表目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 第1章 緒論 1-1 1.1 研究動機 1-1 1.2 研究目的 1-2 1.3 研究範圍與限制 1-3 1.3.1 研究對象 1-3 1.3.2 研究內容 1-4 1.3.3 研究限制 1-4 1.4 研究方法架構 1-5 第2章 文獻回顧 2-1 2.1 使用後評估(POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION) 2-1 2.2 住宅內部空間使用評估之相關文獻 2-7 2.2.1 評估住宅空間 2-7 2.2.2 針對特定使用者對住宅空間的需求 2-9 2.2.3 文獻中的書房空間 2-9 2.3 大學教師宿舍相關資料 2-14 2.3.1 國立大學教師宿舍的歷史沿革 2-14 2.3.2 國立大學教師宿舍目前狀況 2-17 2.3.3 使用社群特質 2-18 第3章 台灣大學有眷宿舍調查計畫 3-1 3.1 台灣大學有眷宿舍 3-1 3.1.1 台灣大學有眷宿舍的現況 3-2 3.1.2 台灣大學有眷宿舍的展望 3-5 3.2 研究策略 3-6 3.3 研究對象 3-10 3.4 問卷設計 3-14 第4章 使用現況與需求度 4-1 4.1 使用現況與需求度調查結果 4-1 4.1.1 人口統計變數 4-1 4.1.2 準備教學與研究行為 4-9 4.1.3 宿舍中準備教學與研究的空間 4-16 4.1.4 設置書房的位置和原則 4-20 4.2 書房需求差異度分析 4-21 4.2.1 年齡、年資、職等 4-21 4.2.2 性別 4-23 4.2.3 家庭因素 4-24 4.2.4 經濟 4-28 4.2.5 交通 4-30 4.2.6 專業別的差異 4-31 4.3 設置書房的位置和原則 4-35 4.3.1 設置書房的位置和原則 4-35 4.3.2 書房形式的選擇：開放書房╱封閉書房 4-38 4.4 小結 4-39 4.4.1 需求度差異之因素和設置書房的位置和原則 4-39 4.4.2 案例模擬 4-43 第5章 結論與建議 5-1 5.1 研究結論 5-1 5.1.1 書房的設置和原則 5-1 5.1.2 宿舍現況探討 5-3 5.2 研究建議 5-4 5.2.1 住戶使用方式多元化，學校應提供二階段供給的住宅 5-4 5.2.2 學校宿舍分配制度 5-6 5.3 後續研究 5-8 5.3.1 研究檢討 5-8 5.3.2 後續研究方向 5-9 參考文獻 附錄一 問卷4006697 bytesapplication/pdfen-US大學教師宿舍書房用後評估dormitory for professorsstudy roomPost-Occupancy Evaluationthesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/50547/1/ntu-93-R91521712-1.pdf