Performance and short-term outcomes of three different transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices in patients with aortic stenosis: A single-center experience

Tzeng, Yun-HsuanYun-HsuanTzengLee, Yung-TsaiYung-TsaiLeeTsao, Tien-PingTien-PingTsaoLee, Kuo-ChenKuo-ChenLeeKUAN-CHIH HUANGHsiung, Ming-ChonMing-ChonHsiungWei JengYin, Wei-HsianWei-HsianYin2023-09-062023-09-062019-1117264901https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074622855&doi=10.1097%2fJCMA.0000000000000187&origin=inward&txGid=3fd174348c270450003ba4fcd1ddf4ffhttps://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/635114Data on whether different transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices and delivery approaches can achieve equally favorable outcomes when performed by a single heart team are scarce. We sought to compare the performance and short-term outcomes of three different TAVR devices-self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve (MCV), mechanically expanded Lotus valve, and balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN XT (SXT)-for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) in a single large-volume center in Taiwan.enBalloon-expandable valve | Mechanically expanded valve | Outcomes | Self-expanding valve | Transcatheter aortic valve replacement[SDGs]SDG3Performance and short-term outcomes of three different transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices in patients with aortic stenosis: A single-center experiencejournal article10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000187316935322-s2.0-85074622855https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85074622855