國立臺灣大學政治學系Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University林俊宏2017-09-082018-06-282017-09-082018-06-282007-06http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/281663http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/281663/1/0032_200706_5.pdf《南華真經注疏》作為《莊子》極為重要的疏本，除了代表成玄英自身的思想特色，同時也是唐代重玄思想的重要著作，本文從重玄義理的討論出發，簡單地討論了重玄的意義與歷史地位，並從中論述道教思想與道家、儒家、佛教哲學的對應與交融。在整個論文的處理上，以這個重玄的作品為核心分析了成玄英的重玄思想，並試圖點出成玄英重玄思想如何受到佛學中觀論的影響，在宣教的企圖中結合了老莊道家、黃老道家、儒家等集團思維的成就，完成了對應唐初政治格局的政治統治思維。本文分別論述成玄英三個層面的思考：重玄論述、聖人論述與統治論述，並且試圖將這三個層面連繫起來，認為在這三個面向的連繫上，成玄英說明了世俗與神聖兩端的接駁可能，正是透過聖知與俗智在重玄義理中的不同向度開展，成玄英進行了存有與知識合致的說教，而這種說教恰恰體現了重玄「非本非末」到「非非本非末」進而是「即本即末」的精神，這種二偏雙遣乃至不一不異的說教，將神聖與世俗、聖知與俗智、宗教與現世政治都納入即存有即真知的範疇，透過方法上的「以空解莊」不僅傳承了傳統中國以道家為核心的存有觀點，更在佛教義理的補足下，豐富地開展了自身與外在世界的認識，不僅反映了初唐三教爭論的現實，更清楚地回應了初唐的政治統治需求，進而影響了宋明理學思想的集大成發展！This article deals with a text that is known as the most important sub-commentary of Zhuang-Zi--Nan Hua Zhen Jing Zhu (also known as Sub-Commentary of Zhuang Zi). We shall analyze the academic position of this text and discuss the epistemological and ontological questions found in the Double-Negation School of writing. We shall deal with three important issues in this article: Double negation discourse, sage discourse, and the governing discourse. We will also discuss questions such as why Double Negation School was initiated, what the ultimate meaning of Double Negation is, how Buddhist thought influences double negation thought and how the divine differs from and interacts with the secular. The core of the dissertation will focus on the statement that the ideal ruler (the sage) governs by cultivating himself through the thinking of double negation. We shall also try to initiate some critical points for further study during the discussion: the relationship between Confucian and Taoist Schools during the Han dynasty, as far as the Wei-Jing and Sui-Tang eras, the hierarchy of political and religious affairs, the body and the state, physically or mentally emphasizing viewpoints, body formation in the state building process and the interpretation of Zhuang-Zi by Buddhism, these are hidden in traditional Chinese political philosophy. The Sub-Commentary of Zhuang Zi reflects the political and religious situation and conveys the internal essence of the political discourses of Taoist and Confucian School to Taoist religion. Undoubtedly this writing itself is a part of the process of state formation and a result of the dominance of political power in the Tang dynasty.32186625 bytesapplication/pdf成玄英；重玄；四句百非；不一不異；中觀論；空；無為；state formation；sage ideal leader；double negation；Sub-commentary of Zhuang Zi；emptiness and reality(空)journal articlehttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/281663/1/0032_200706_5.pdf