Chen K.-L.Chen C.-T.Chou Y.-T.Shih C.-L.Koh C.-L.CHING-LIN HSIEH2020-04-082020-04-0820140003-9993https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899513157&doi=10.1016%2fj.apmr.2014.01.014&partnerID=40&md5=0c6850d6a48e3730422d3c66678c8810https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/483855Objective To compare the responsiveness of the Rasch-calibrated 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor Scale with that of the 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale at both an individual and a group level. Design Repeated-measurements design. Setting Medical center. Participants Patients (N=301) 14 days after stroke. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, and 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale. Results The patients were assessed with the original 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale 4 times, at 14, 30, 90, and 180 days after stroke onset. The patients' responses were used for estimating the Rasch scores of the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale. The effect size, standardized response mean, and paired t test were used to compare the group-based responsiveness of the 3 forms (50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale). Individual-level responsiveness was compared based on the significance of change between the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale. Because up to 13 items of the 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale did not meet the Rasch model's assumptions, the significance of change of the 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale was not calculated. At the group level, the FM-37 and FM-12 Fugl-Meyer motor scale had sufficient and similar responsiveness. At the individual level, the FM-37 Fugl-Meyer motor scale detected more patients with significant improvement than the FM-12 Fugl-Meyer motor scale. The SC values and category distribution of the FM-37 Fugl-Meyer motor scale were significantly better than those of the FM-12 Fugl-Meyer motor scale (P<.001). Conclusions Although the group-level responsiveness of the 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale was sufficient and very similar to that of the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale had better individual-level responsiveness. The 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale is suggested as an outcome measure for both clinicians and researchers. ? 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.[SDGs]SDG3age; article; bootstrapping; brain hemorrhage; brain infarction; cerebrovascular accident; comparative study; controlled study; follow up; Fugl Meyer Motor Scale; hospital admission; human; ICD-9; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; major clinical study; motor coordination; motor performance; named inventories, questionnaires and rating scales; occupational therapist; patient assessment; Rasch analysis; sex difference; Outcome assessment; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Activities of Daily Living; Adaptation, Physiological; Aged; Computer Simulation; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Skills; Psychometrics; Recovery of Function; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Upper Extremityjournal article10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.014244914662-s2.0-84899513157