國立臺灣大學中國文學系劉文清Liu, Wen-chingWen-chingLiu2006-12-192018-05-292006-12-192018-05-292004-09-13http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/2006121215550029｢之言｣一直被訓詁家公認為探求語源之術語，然經由本文對王念孫《讀書雜志》｢之言｣術語所作之分析發現，其術語主要作用在於釋義而非探源，因《雜志》本為｢隨文釋義｣之訓詁專書，對術語之運用自然亦出於訓詁學釋義之觀念。 然而，較諸王氏另一名著《廣雅疏證》，其中｢之言｣術語既可用於釋義、亦可據以推源，探究二者之所以歧異，殆亦由於各書之性質使然。《廣雅》乃｢通釋語義｣之專著，原本即具多重之屬性，王氏為作《疏證》，自亦依其｢語義｣性質之不同而或探源、或釋義。 最後，本文綜合對《雜志》一系列｢因聲求義｣術語之解讀，而將其｢因聲求義｣之法重新定義為：依據聲音之關係以推求文本具體詞義之訓詁方法，作用在於釋義，而此亦與其書之性質正相吻合也。'Zhi Yan' has long been considered to be a terminology in the etymological research, yet my study on Wang Nian-sun's 'Zhi Yan' of Du Shu Za Zhi finds that its terminological function is for interpretation instead of etymological investigation. Since Du Shu Za Zhi is a academic book of Scholium on 'Sui Wen Sui Yi' (contextual interpretation), the application of the terminologies is derived from the concept of interpretation in Scholium.application/pdf1071148 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW王念孫讀書雜志訓詁術語之言因聲求義Du Shu ZA ZhiTerminologyYin Sheng Qiu YiWang Nian-Sunjournal articlehttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/2006121215550029/1/1160018047879251001855.pdf