Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Intramuscular olanzapine versus intramuscular haloperidol plus lorazepam for the treatment of acute schizophrenia with agitation: An open-label, randomized controlled trial
 
  • Details

Intramuscular olanzapine versus intramuscular haloperidol plus lorazepam for the treatment of acute schizophrenia with agitation: An open-label, randomized controlled trial

Journal
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Journal Volume
114
Journal Issue
5
Pages
438-445
Date Issued
2015
Author(s)
Huang C.L.C.
TZUNG-JENG HWANG  
Chen Y.-H.
Huang G.-H.
MING-HSIEN HSIEH  
Chen, Tony Hsiu Hsi  
HAI-GWO HWU  
DOI
10.1016/j.jfma.2015.01.018
URI
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/476390
Abstract
Background/Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety profile between intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and IM haloperidol plus IM lorazepam in acute schizophrenic patients with moderate to severe agitation. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. Acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (. n=67) were randomized to receive 10mg IM olanzapine (. n=37) or 5mg IM haloperidol plus 2mg IM lorazepam (. n=30). Agitation was measured with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC) and Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES) during the first 2 hours and at 24 hours after the first injection. Safety was assessed using the Simpson-Angus Scale and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale and by recording adverse events at 24 hours following the first injection. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale was also rated. Results: The PANSS-EC scores decreased significantly at 2 hours after the first injection in both groups (olanzapine: -10.2, p<0.001; haloperidol+lorazepam: -9.9, p<0.001). Haloperidol plus lorazepam was not inferior to olanzapine in reducing agitation at 2 hours. There were no significant differences in PANSS-EC or ACES scores between the two groups within 2 hours following the first injection. The frequencies of adverse events and changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Simpson-Angus Scale, and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale scores from baseline to 24 hours showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: The findings suggest that IM haloperidol (5mg) plus lorazepam (2mg) is not inferior to IM olanzapine (10mg) in the treatment of acute schizophrenic patients with moderate to severe agitation (. ClinialTrials.gov identifier number NCT00797277). ? 2015 .
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
haloperidol; lorazepam; olanzapine; benzodiazepine derivative; haloperidol; lorazepam; neuroleptic agent; olanzapine; acute disease; acute schizophrenia; adult; aged; Agitation Calmness Evaluation Scale; Article; Barnes Akathisia Scale; Clinical Global Impression scale; comparative effectiveness; controlled study; demography; drug efficacy; drug safety; DSM-IV; female; human; major clinical study; male; open study; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component; prospective study; randomized controlled trial; restlessness; schizoaffective psychosis; schizophrenia; schizophrenia assessment; Simpson-Angus Scale; clinical trial; combination drug therapy; comparative study; intramuscular drug administration; middle aged; phase 3 clinical trial; psychological rating scale; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; schizophrenia; Taiwan; treatment outcome; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Lorazepam; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science