Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. Occupational Therapy / 職能治療學系所
  4. Is the long form of the fugl-meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?
 
  • Details

Is the long form of the fugl-meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?

Journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Journal Volume
95
Journal Issue
5
Pages
941-949
Date Issued
2014
Author(s)
Chen K.-L.
Chen C.-T.
Chou Y.-T.
Shih C.-L.
Koh C.-L.
CHING-LIN HSIEH  
DOI
10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.014
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899513157&doi=10.1016%2fj.apmr.2014.01.014&partnerID=40&md5=0c6850d6a48e3730422d3c66678c8810
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/483855
Abstract
Objective To compare the responsiveness of the Rasch-calibrated 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor Scale with that of the 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale at both an individual and a group level. Design Repeated-measurements design. Setting Medical center. Participants Patients (N=301) 14 days after stroke. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, and 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale. Results The patients were assessed with the original 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale 4 times, at 14, 30, 90, and 180 days after stroke onset. The patients' responses were used for estimating the Rasch scores of the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale. The effect size, standardized response mean, and paired t test were used to compare the group-based responsiveness of the 3 forms (50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale). Individual-level responsiveness was compared based on the significance of change between the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale. Because up to 13 items of the 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale did not meet the Rasch model's assumptions, the significance of change of the 50-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale was not calculated. At the group level, the FM-37 and FM-12 Fugl-Meyer motor scale had sufficient and similar responsiveness. At the individual level, the FM-37 Fugl-Meyer motor scale detected more patients with significant improvement than the FM-12 Fugl-Meyer motor scale. The SC values and category distribution of the FM-37 Fugl-Meyer motor scale were significantly better than those of the FM-12 Fugl-Meyer motor scale (P<.001). Conclusions Although the group-level responsiveness of the 12-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale was sufficient and very similar to that of the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale, the 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale had better individual-level responsiveness. The 37-item Fugl-Meyer motor scale is suggested as an outcome measure for both clinicians and researchers. ? 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
age; article; bootstrapping; brain hemorrhage; brain infarction; cerebrovascular accident; comparative study; controlled study; follow up; Fugl Meyer Motor Scale; hospital admission; human; ICD-9; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; major clinical study; motor coordination; motor performance; named inventories, questionnaires and rating scales; occupational therapist; patient assessment; Rasch analysis; sex difference; Outcome assessment; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Activities of Daily Living; Adaptation, Physiological; Aged; Computer Simulation; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Skills; Psychometrics; Recovery of Function; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Upper Extremity
Publisher
W.B. Saunders
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science