https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/483913
標題: | Development of a Chinese version of the oswestry disability index version 2.1 | 作者: | Lue Y.-J. CHING-LIN HSIEH Huang M.-H. Lin G.-T. Lu Y.-M. |
公開日期: | 2008 | 卷: | 33 | 期: | 21 | 起(迄)頁: | 2354-2360 | 來源出版物: | Spine | 摘要: | Study Design. Cross-cultural adaptation and cross-sectional psychometric testing in a convenience sample of patients with low back pain. Objective. To translate and culturally adapt the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1 (ODI 2.1) into a Mandarin Chinese version and to assess its reliability and validity. Summary of Background Data. The Chinese ODI 2.1 has not been developed and validated. Methods. The ODI 2.1 was translated and culturally adapted to the Chinese version. The validity of the translated Chinese version was assessed by examining the relationship between the ODI and other well-known measures. Test-retest reliability was examined in 52 of these patients, who completed a second questionnaire within 1 week. Results. Internal consistency of the ODI 2.1 was excellent with Cronbach's α = 0.903. The intraclass correlation coefficient of test-retest reliability was 0.89. The minimal detectable change was 12.8. The convergent validity of the Chinese ODI is supported by its high correlation with other physical functional status measures (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and SF-36 physical functioning subscale, r = 0.76 and -0.75, respectively), and moderate correlation with other measures (Visual Analogue Scale, r = 0.68) and certain SF-36 subscales (role-physical, bodily pain, and social functioning, r range: -0.49 to -0.57). As expected, the ODI was least correlated with nonfunctional measures (SF-36 mental subscale and role-emotional subscale, r = -0.25 and -0.33, respectively). Conclusion. The results of this study indicate that the Chinese version of the ODI 2.1 is a reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of functional status in patients with low back pain. ? 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. |
URI: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-65849527296&doi=10.1097%2fBRS.0b013e31818018d8&partnerID=40&md5=eab61250093a060bdf373b128c3a39a5 https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/483913 |
ISSN: | 0362-2436 | DOI: | 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818018d8 | SDG/關鍵字: | adult; aged; article; Chinese; clinical article; correlation coefficient; Cronbach alpha coefficient; cultural factor; female; functional assessment; human; instrumentation; internal consistency; low back pain; male; measurement; Oswestry Disability Index; priority journal; questionnaire; rating scale; reliability; Roland Morris disability; Short Form 36; test retest reliability; validity; visual analog scale; adolescent; Asian; comparative study; cross-sectional study; disability; ethnology; hospitalization; language; low back pain; methodology; middle aged; psychometry; standard; validation study; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Male; Middle Aged; Multilingualism; Psychometrics; Questionnaires; Severity of Illness Index; Young Adult |
顯示於: | 職能治療學系 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。