Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Comparison of two methods for idiopathic clubfoot treatment: A case-controlled study in Taiwan
 
  • Details

Comparison of two methods for idiopathic clubfoot treatment: A case-controlled study in Taiwan

Journal
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Journal Volume
118
Journal Issue
2
Pages
636
Date Issued
2019-02
Author(s)
Chen, Chunho
TING-MING WANG  
KUAN-WEN WU  
Huang, Shier-Chieg
Kuo, Ken N.
DOI
10.1016/j.jfma.2018.08.001
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052130745&doi=10.1016%2fj.jfma.2018.08.001&partnerID=40&md5=df369dbf745738eab992489f0859cae0
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/507484
Abstract
Background/Purpose: In last century, two distinctive methods of manipulation and casting were developed, Kite method and Ponseti method. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of parallel series between two methods in one institution. Methods: From 2003 to 2008, two pediatric orthopedic services in one institution treated 57 patients with 88 idiopathic clubfeet. One service continued using Kite casting method consisted of 58 feet, and other service employed Ponseti casting method consisted of 30 feet. There was a minimum of 4 years follow-up. Results: Both groups had similar Dimeglio severity scores before treatment. Initial correction was achieved in 40 feet (69%) in the Kite group compared with 27 feet (90%) in the Ponseti group, while 19 feet (63.3%) had percutaneous Achilles tenotomy. The Ponseti method was found to have a significantly higher correction rate (p = 0.028). After a mean follow-up of 72 months, there were 29 relapses (50%) in the Kite group and 8 relapses (26.7%) in the Ponseti group with significant difference (p = 0.036). At the latest follow-up, the outcome measures were 24 feet (41.4%) good, 18 feet (31%) fair and 16 (27.6%) poor in the Kite group and 25 feet (83.3%) good, 3 feet (10%) fair and 2 feet (6.7%) poor in the Ponseti group with significant difference between two groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this simultaneous series of two casting methods in a single institution with more than 4 years follow up, we concluded that Ponseti method significantly achieved better midterm outcome in clubfoot management. ? 2018
Subjects
Clubfoot; Comparative effectiveness research; Kite method; Ponseti method
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
achilles tendon; Article; case control study; child; clubfoot; comparative study; controlled study; Dimeglio clubfoot severity score; female; follow up; forefoot; human; idiopathic disease; intermethod comparison; Kite method; major clinical study; male; manipulative medicine; Ponseti method; relapse; scoring system; Taiwan; tendon transfer; tenotomy; treatment outcome; clubfoot; comparative effectiveness; infant; joint characteristics and functions; newborn; orthopedic manipulation; procedures; recurrent disease; surgery; Achilles Tendon; Case-Control Studies; Clubfoot; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Manipulation, Orthopedic; Range of Motion, Articular; Recurrence; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science