https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/5205
標題: | 《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》別史類分類之比較 A Comparative Study of Historical Classification of Bie-shi in Shu-mu Da-wen and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu |
作者: | 蔡天怡 | 關鍵字: | 書目問答;四庫全書總目;別史類;史部分類;Shu-mu Da-wen(Ansers to Inquiries into Bibliography);Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu(Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection);the Alternative Histories(bie-shi);the Historiography categories | 公開日期: | 三月-2005 | 出版社: | 臺北市:國立臺灣大學圖書館 | 卷: | 9 | 期: | 1 | 起(迄)頁: | 143-156 | 來源出版物: | 大學圖書館 | 摘要: | 「別史」是史部類例中較晚出現的,在史部的地位亦相當模糊。雖然可以「上不至於正史,下不至於雜史」概括說明,卻不易清楚界定其範圍。歷來書目設有別史類者,更是屈指可數。《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》是近代兩部重要的書目,其史部皆有別史一類。本文乃以此二書目為主,比較其別史類所收圖分類之異同,希望有助於釐清別史之特性。 The utilization of Bie-shi(alternative histories) as a class in traditional historical classification began in Sung Dynasty. Bie-shi is usually defined as 'a category which is not as formal as Zheng-shi(Official Dynastic Histories), nut not as casual as Za-shi(Miscellaneous histories).' Still, the meaning and coverage of Bie-shi is not quite clear and well-established. It was not a common category employed in traditional historical classification schemes either. Shu-mu Da-wen(Answers to Inquiries into Bibliography) and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu(Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection) are two important bibliographies in Qing Dynasty. They both employed Bie-shi as a category to classify related woeks. This study attempts to compare and analyze the historical works that were classified in Bie-shi category of these two bibliographies. The goal is to provide a clearer picture about the characteristics of Bie-shi. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/2006121215550533 | 其他識別: | 246246/2006121215550533 |
顯示於: | 歷史學系 |
檔案 | 描述 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
11600181834261541164648.pdf | 23.74 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。