Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Applicability of laboratory deficit-based frailty index in predominantly older patients with end-stage renal disease under chronic dialysis: A pilot test of its correlation with survival and self-reported instruments
 
  • Details

Applicability of laboratory deficit-based frailty index in predominantly older patients with end-stage renal disease under chronic dialysis: A pilot test of its correlation with survival and self-reported instruments

Journal
Nephrology
Journal Volume
25
Journal Issue
1
Pages
73-81
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
CHIA-TER CHAO  
JENQ-WEN HUANG  
CHIH-KANG CHIANG  
KUAN-YU HUNG  
COhort of GEriatric Nephrology in NTUH (COGENT) Study Group
DOI
10.1111/nep.13583
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065305834&doi=10.1111%2fnep.13583&partnerID=40&md5=07b5f17a1f18fcade80f74bfe0bab247
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/531726
Abstract
Aim: Laboratory deficit-based frailty index (LFI) exhibited outcome-prediction ability in the elderly, but not in those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We hypothesized that LFI results might have outcome correlation and correlate closely with other instruments in ESRD patients. Methods: We prospectively enroled ESRD patients between 2014 and 2015 and administered self-report frailty instruments (Strawbridge questionnaire, Edmonton frail scale (EFS), Groningen frailty indicator (GFI), Tilburg frailty indicator, G8 questionnaire and FRAIL scale), and Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) scale, with two types of LFI calculated. They were followed up until June 30, 2017. Correlations between the results of six instruments, CHS scale, and those of LFI were identified, followed by Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and logistic regression analyses to compare those with high and low LFI. Results: The frailty prevalence was 33.3% (CHS), 78.8% Strawbridge questionnaire, 45.5% (EFS), 57.6% (GFI), 27.3% (Tilburg frailty indicator), 84.8% (G8) and 18.2% (FRAIL) among ESRD participants. LFI-1 results were significantly correlated with those of LFI-2 (P < 0.01), EFS (P = 0.04) and GFI (P < 0.01), while LFI-2 results were not. Those with CHS or GFI-identified frailty had significantly lower 1,25-(OH)2-D levels than those without. After 32.3 ± 5.4 months, patients with high LFI-1 scores, but not LFI-2, had a significantly higher mortality than those with lower scores. GFI and EFS scores were also independently associated with LFI-1, while CHS scores exhibited borderline association only. Conclusion: Among a group of predominantly older ESRD patients, LFI differentiates patients with good and poor outcomes, supporting its applicability in these patients. ? 2019 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
aged; Article; Cardiovascular Health Study; clinical article; clinical outcome; cohort analysis; controlled study; correlational study; Edmonton Frail Scale; end stage renal disease; female; FRAIL scale; functional status assessment; G8 questionnaire; Groningen frailty indicator; human; human cell; laboratory deficit based frailty index; male; mortality; pilot study; prevalence; priority journal; prospective study; renal replacement therapy; Strawbridge questionnaire; survival analysis; Tilburg frailty indicator; adverse event; age; blood; blood pressure; chronic kidney failure; comparative study; epidemiology; frailty; geriatric assessment; heart rate; hemodialysis; middle aged; pathophysiology; predictive value; risk assessment; risk factor; self report; Taiwan; treatment outcome; biological marker; Age Factors; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Female; Frailty; Geriatric Assessment; Heart Rate; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Predictive Value of Tests; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Self Report; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science