Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Research Outputs
  • Explore by
    • Organizations
    • Researchers
    • Research Outputs
  • Academic & Publications
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. NTU Scholars
  2. 醫學院
  3. 醫學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/540970
Title: Distinct aetiopathogenesis in subgroups of functional dyspepsia according to the Rome III criteria
Authors: YU-JEN FANG 
JYH-MING LIOU 
CHIEH-CHANG CHEN 
Lee J.-Y.
Hsu Y.-C.
Chen M.-J.
PING-HUEI TSENG 
CHIEN-CHUAN CHEN 
Chang C.-Y.
Yang T.-H.
Chang W.-H.
Wu J.-Y.
HSIU-PO WANG 
Luo J.-C.
Lin J.-T.
CHIA-TUNG SHUN 
MING-SHIANG WU 
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Journal Volume: 64
Journal Issue: 10
Start page/Pages: 1517-1528
Source: Gut
Abstract: 
Background and objective Whether there is distinct pathogenesis in subgroups of functional dyspepsia (FD), the postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) remains controversial. We aimed to identify the risk factors of FD and its subgroups in the Chinese population. Methods Patients with dyspepsia and healthy subjects who underwent gastric cancer screening were enrolled in this multicentre study from 2010 to 2012. All patients were evaluated by questionnaire, oesophagoduodenoscopy, histological examination and Helicobacter pylori tests. Subgroups of FD were classified according to the Rome III criteria. Psychiatric stress was assessed by the short form Brief Symptom Rating Scale. CagA and VacA genotypes were determined by PCR. Results Of 2378 patients screened for eligibility, 771 and 491 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of uninvestigated dyspepsia and FD, respectively. 298 (60.7%) and 353 (71.9%) individuals were diagnosed with EPS and PDS, respectively, whereas 169 (34.4%) had the overlap syndrome. As compared with 1031 healthy controls, PDS and EPS shared some common risk factors, including younger age (OR 0.95; 99.5% CI 0.93 to 0.98), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR 6.60; 99.5% CI 3.13 to 13.90), anxiety (OR 3.41; 99.5% CI 2.01 to 5.77) and concomitant IBS (OR 6.89; 99.5% CI 3.41 to 13.94). By contrast, H. pylori (OR 1.86; 99.5% CI 1.01 to 3.45), unmarried status (OR 4.22; 99.5% CI 2.02 to 8.81), sleep disturbance (OR 2.56; 99.5% CI 1.29 to 5.07) and depression (OR 2.34; 99.5% CI 1.04 to 5.36) were associated with PDS. Moderate to severe antral atrophy and CagA positive strains were also more prevalent in PDS. Conclusions Different risk factors exist among FD subgroups based on the Rome III criteria, indicating distinct aetiopathogenesis of the subdivisions that may necessitate different therapeutic strategies.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84941278519&doi=10.1136%2fgutjnl-2014-308114&partnerID=40&md5=e979319acf47002eac1f211ccdab0378
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/540970
ISSN: 0017-5749
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308114
SDG/Keyword: acetylsalicylic acid; bacterial antigen; bacterial protein; cagA protein, Helicobacter pylori; VacA protein, Helicobacter pylori; adult; age; anxiety; Article; bacterial strain; cancer screening; Chinese; coffee; controlled study; cross-sectional study; depression; disease association; disease classification; disease severity; distress syndrome; dyspepsia; epigastric pain syndrome; esophagogastroduodenoscopy; female; genotype; Helicobacter pylori; histopathology; human; inflammatory bowel disease; major clinical study; male; pathogenesis; polymerase chain reaction; postprandial distress syndrome; priority journal; prospective study; rating scale; risk factor; sleep disorder; stomach cancer; aged; clinical trial; complication; differential diagnosis; dyspepsia; follow up; gastric mucosa; gastrointestinal endoscopy; genetics; Helicobacter Infections; isolation and purification; lifestyle; mental stress; microbiology; middle aged; multicenter study; pathology; postprandial state; predictive value; questionnaire; Aged; Antigens, Bacterial; Bacterial Proteins; Diagnosis, Differential; Dyspepsia; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastric Mucosa; Genotype; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Life Style; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stress, Psychological; Surveys and Questionnaires
[SDGs]SDG3
Appears in Collections:醫學系

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

59
checked on Mar 27, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

49
checked on Mar 12, 2023

Page view(s)

26
checked on Mar 26, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Sherpa Romeo網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Sherpa Romeo to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback