Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. Clinical Medicine / 臨床醫學研究所
  4. Can noninvasive biomarkers replace liver biopsy for chronic hepatitis B?
 
  • Details

Can noninvasive biomarkers replace liver biopsy for chronic hepatitis B?

Journal
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
Journal Volume
62
Journal Issue
6
Pages
1924-1925
Date Issued
2015
Author(s)
Lin C.-L.
JIA-HORNG KAO  
DOI
10.1002/hep.27865
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85028283021&doi=10.1002%2fhep.27865&partnerID=40&md5=3b8a18f4537327d076d32419decb2591
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/581930
Abstract
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report. To the Editor: We read with great interest the article entitled "Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index and fibrosis‐4 index for detecting liver fibrosis in adult patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systemic review and meta‐analysis" by Xiao et al.1 Severity of hepatic fibrosis is one of the important prognostic factors in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, even in those with complete viral response to antivirals.2 Although histological examination remains the gold standard to determine the stage of hepatic fibrosis, there exist several limitations of liver biopsy, such as potential complications, sampling error, and intra‐/interobserver variability.3 Therefore, alternative noninvasive fibrosis assessment by using imaging techniques or surrogate biomarkers have been increasingly recognized. In this timely meta‐analysis, the authors systematically reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of two noninvasive biomarkers, aspartate aminotransferase‐to‐platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis‐4 index (FIB‐4), for HBV‐related hepatic fibrosis. Their findings demonstrated that APRI and FIB‐4 could not only accurately assess the severity of hepatic fibrosis, but also be applicable to monitor the progression of fibrosis. Nevertheless, these biomarkers for assessment of hepatic fibrosis are still not ideal and deserve attention. First, although the meta‐analysis indicated that both APRI and FIB‐4 were useful noninvasive biomarkers to evaluate severity of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients, little is known about when liver biopsy could be omitted and how many patients could be correctly diagnosed without invasive liver biopsy. In our recent study, FIB‐4 and APRI were compared to evaluate their diagnostic values in identifying significant fibrosis and cirrhosis among 631 chronic hepatitis B patients.6 FIB‐4 had a significantly higher area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve than APRI to identify significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Using FIB‐4 outside the 0.87‐3.40 range, significant fibrosis could be excluded in 69.2% and cirrhosis could be diagnosed in 84.4% of patients. Furthermore, 62.1% of patients in the validation set could be identified without performing invasive liver biopsy. However, it was not likely to differentiate fibrosis stage for those patients with FIB‐4 between 0.87 and 3.40. Therefore, ultrasound‐based transient elastography, or even liver biopsy, is still required for these patients to confirm fibrosis stages. Second, the analysis on the discrepant results between biomarkers and liver histology is important. Our previous study showed a discordant rate of 16.1% for FIB‐4 and 25% for APRI for cirrhosis between noninvasive biomarkers and liver biopsy. In addition, serum alanine aminotransferase level >400 U/L was the main reason of FIB‐4 failure.6 Therefore, the performance of these biomarkers in chronic hepatitis B patients is also limited by hepatitis flares, and repeated measurement after remission of hepatitis activity is required. In summary, despite significant advances in developing noninvasive biomarkers that help practicing physicians evaluate hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients, further large, prospective studies remain essential to validate accuracy, particularly for patients with mild hepatic fibrosis. Furthermore, a combination of noninvasive biomarkers and ultrasound‐based transient elastography may establish an algorithm to increase diagnostic accuracy as it does in chronic hepatitis C.7 Liver biopsy is still the gold standard to confirm fibrosis stage in patients with indeterminate noninvasive staging.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
aspartate aminotransferase; blood; complication; hepatitis B; human; liver cirrhosis; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis
Type
letter

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science