Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Research Outputs
  • Explore by
    • Organizations
    • Researchers
    • Research Outputs
  • Academic & Publications
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. NTU Scholars
  2. 醫學院
  3. 職能治療學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/582370
Title: Comparison of construct validity of two short forms of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale
Authors: Chou C.-Y.
CHIEN-YU HUANG 
YI-JING HUANG 
Lin G.-H.
SHEAU-LING HUANG 
Lee S.-C.
CHING-LIN HSIEH 
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal Volume: 12
Journal Issue: 12
Start page/Pages: e0188478
Source: PLoS ONE
Abstract: 
Background: No studies have compared the 2-factor structures of Wong’s and Post’s versions of the short-form Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (i.e., 12-item SSQOL) scale. This study compared the construct validity of 2 short-forms of the 12-item-SSQOL (not the 12-domain-SSQOL). Methods: Data were obtained from a previous validation study of the original 49-item SSQOL in 263 patients. Construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine whether the two-factor structure, including psychosocial and physical domains, was supported in both versions. The CFA tested the data-model fit by indices: chi-square χ2/df ratio, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), nonnormative fit index (NNFI), standard root mean square residual (SRMR), and parsimony normed fit index (PNFI). Item factor loadings (cutoffs: .50) were examined. Model fit was compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and consistent AIC (i.e., CAIC) values. Results: All model fit indices for Post’s version fell within expected ranges: χ2/df ratio = 2.02, RMSEA = 0.05, CFI = 0.97, NNFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.06, and PNFI = 0.76. In the psychosocial domain, the item factor loadings ranged from 0.46 to 0.63. In the physical domain, all items (except the language and vision items) had acceptable factor loadings (0.68 to 0.88). However, in Wong’s version, none of the model indices met the criteria for good fit. In model fit comparisons, Post’s version had smaller AIC and CAIC values than did Wong’s version. Conclusions: All fit indices supported Post’s version, but not Wong’s version. The construct validity of Post’s version with a 2-factor structure was confirmed, and this version of the 12-item SSQOL is recommended. ? 2017 Chou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85037102039&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0188478&partnerID=40&md5=bf1d8db0ec798cd3414e7479a76fe8e3
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/582370
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188478
SDG/Keyword: adult; Article; cerebrovascular accident; confirmatory factor analysis; construct validity; content validity; female; functional status; human; major clinical study; male; measurement accuracy; middle aged; physical capacity; psychological well-being; quality of life; quality of life assessment; social psychology; Stroke Specific Quality of Life; validation study; aged; cerebrovascular accident; comparative study; pathophysiology; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Stroke
[SDGs]SDG3
Appears in Collections:職能治療學系

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Feb 27, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Mar 5, 2023

Page view(s)

25
checked on Mar 24, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Sherpa Romeo網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Sherpa Romeo to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback