Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Research Outputs
  • Explore by
    • Organizations
    • Researchers
    • Research Outputs
  • Academic & Publications
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. NTU Scholars
  2. 醫學院
  3. 職能治療學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/582377
Title: Validation of the brief pain inventory in patients with low back pain
Authors: Song C.-Y.
Lin S.-F.
CHIEN-YU HUANG 
Wu H.-C.
Chen C.-H.
CHING-LIN HSIEH 
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Journal Volume: 41
Journal Issue: 15
Start page/Pages: E937-E942
Source: Spine
Abstract: 
Study Design. Cross-sectional psychometric testing in a sample of patients with low back pain (LBP). Objective. The aim of this study was to examine the construct, convergent, and discriminative validity of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) in patients with LBP. Summary of Background Data. The BPI was originally developed to assess cancer pain. Currently, it is commonly used to measure pain intensity and pain interference in patients with malignant or nonmalignant pain. However, the two-factor construct of the BPI has not been confirmed in an LBP population. Methods. A total of 271 patients with LBP completed the BPI and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires. The construct validity (i.e., the two-factor structure: intensity scale and interference scale) of the BPI was determined by confirmatory factor analysis. The convergent validity was investigated by examining the relationships between the BPI scales and the ODI scores. The discriminative validity of the BPI was examined by testing if the BPI scale scores differed among groups of patients with different levels of disability. Results. Confirmatory factor analysis partially confirmed the two-factor structure of the BPI for use in patients with LBP. The convergent validity of the BPI was supported by its moderate correlation between the interference scale and the ODI score (ρ=0.66, P<0.001), and by its low correlation between the intensity scale and the ODI score (ρ=0.39, P<0.001). Finally, both the intensity scale and the interference scale discriminated among patients with varying levels of disability (both P<0.001). Conclusion. The two-factor structure of the BPI as a measure of pain intensity and interference in patients with LBP was partially confirmed. Furthermore, our results lend some supports to the convergent validity and discriminative validity of the BPI. ? 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84956955707&doi=10.1097%2fBRS.0000000000001478&partnerID=40&md5=5b8b966c5ba7fe8407e446f1d0181a2c
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/582377
ISSN: 0362-2436
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001478
SDG/Keyword: adult; Article; Brief Pain Inventory; cancer pain; construct validity; convergent validity; cross-sectional study; diagnostic test accuracy study; factorial analysis; female; human; low back pain; major clinical study; male; Oswestry Disability Index; pain intensity; pain interference; priority journal; psychometry; spondylolisthesis; spondylolysis; spondylosis; aged; disability; factor analysis; low back pain; middle aged; pain measurement; procedures; questionnaire; time factor; very elderly; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disability Evaluation; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Psychometrics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors
[SDGs]SDG3
Appears in Collections:職能治療學系

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

34
checked on Mar 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

33
checked on Mar 12, 2023

Page view(s)

20
checked on Mar 20, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Sherpa Romeo網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Sherpa Romeo to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback