Primary aldosteronism: diagnostic accuracy of the losartan and captopril tests
Journal
American journal of hypertension
Journal Volume
22
Journal Issue
8
Date Issued
2009-08
Author(s)
Chang, Hung-Wei
Hsieh, Bor-Sen
Abstract
To assess whether angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) offer any additional advantage in confirming the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) and their use in the differentiation of PA subtypes.
Background: To assess whether angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) offer any additional advantage in confirming the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) and their use in the differentiation of PA subtypes.
Methods: A prospective, cohort, head-to-head study was conducted between July 2003 and July 2006. A total of 135 patients received captopril and losartan tests to confirm the diagnosis of PA in the TAIPAI (Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation) intervention.
Results: In total, 71 patients were diagnosed with PA. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the postcaptopril plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was significantly less than that of the postlosartan PAC (0.744 vs. 0.829, P = 0.038). Using an aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR, ng/dl per ng/ml/h) >35 with a PAC >10 ng/dl, the specificity was 89.1% vs. 93.8% and the sensitivity was 66.2% vs. 84.5 % for the captopril test vs. the losartan test, respectively. With respect to the losartan test, the accuracy was 88.9%, the agreement was good (k = 0.778), and there was no disagreement with the McNemar test (P = 0.118). Losartan had the advantage of a better negative predictive value to exclude PA when patients were referred with a serum potassium (SK) level <3.8 mmol/l. When a postlosartan ARR >60 was the cutoff value, the positive predictive value was 82% with a negative predictive value of 57% in distinguishing aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) from idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA).
Conclusions: The postlosartan ARR and PAC were shown to have better accuracy for the diagnosis of PA than the captopril test. With a postlosartan ARR >60, APAs can be adequately differentiated from IHA.
Methods: A prospective, cohort, head-to-head study was conducted between July 2003 and July 2006. A total of 135 patients received captopril and losartan tests to confirm the diagnosis of PA in the TAIPAI (Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation) intervention.
Results: In total, 71 patients were diagnosed with PA. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the postcaptopril plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was significantly less than that of the postlosartan PAC (0.744 vs. 0.829, P = 0.038). Using an aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR, ng/dl per ng/ml/h) >35 with a PAC >10 ng/dl, the specificity was 89.1% vs. 93.8% and the sensitivity was 66.2% vs. 84.5 % for the captopril test vs. the losartan test, respectively. With respect to the losartan test, the accuracy was 88.9%, the agreement was good (k = 0.778), and there was no disagreement with the McNemar test (P = 0.118). Losartan had the advantage of a better negative predictive value to exclude PA when patients were referred with a serum potassium (SK) level <3.8 mmol/l. When a postlosartan ARR >60 was the cutoff value, the positive predictive value was 82% with a negative predictive value of 57% in distinguishing aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) from idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA).
Conclusions: The postlosartan ARR and PAC were shown to have better accuracy for the diagnosis of PA than the captopril test. With a postlosartan ARR >60, APAs can be adequately differentiated from IHA.
Type
journal article