Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Comparison of serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin G in the treatment of early syphilis in HIV-infected patients: A multi-center observational study
 
  • Details

Comparison of serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin G in the treatment of early syphilis in HIV-infected patients: A multi-center observational study

Journal
PLoS ONE
Journal Volume
9
Journal Issue
10
Pages
e109813
Date Issued
2014
Author(s)
Tsai J.-C.
Lin Y.-H.
Lu P.-L.
Shen N.-J.
Yang C.-J.
Lee N.-Y.
Tang H.-J.
Liu Y.-M.
Huang W.-C.
Lee C.-H.
Ko W.-C.
Chen Y.-H.
Lin H.-H.
Chen T.-C.
CHIEN-CHING HUNG  
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0109813
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84907934481&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0109813&partnerID=40&md5=18dd77e0da8066cdda9d54350b471233
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/588814
Abstract
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of HIV-infected patients with early syphilis who received doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days (doxycycline group) and those who received 1 dose of benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units) (penicillin group) between 2007 and 2013. Serological responses defined as a decline of rapid plasma reagin titer by 4-fold or greater at 6 and 12 months of treatment were compared between the two groups.Results: During the study period, 123 and 271 patients in the doxycycline and penicillin group, respectively, completed 6 months or longer follow-up. Ninety-one and 271 patients in the doxycycline and penicillin group, respectively, completed 12 months or longer follow-up. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except that, compared with penicillin group, doxycycline group had a lower proportion of patients with secondary syphilis (65.4% versus 41.5%, P, 0.0001) and a higher proportion of patients with early latent syphilis (25.3% versus 49.6%, P,0.0001). No statistically significant differences were found in the serological response rates to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin at 6 months (63.4% versus 72.3%, P = 0.075) and 12 months of treatment (65.9% versus 68.3%, P = 0.681). In multivariate analysis, secondary syphilis, but not treatment regimen, was consistently associated with serological response at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.Conclusions: The serological response rates to a 14-day course of doxycycline and a single dose of benzathine penicillin were similar in HIV-infected patients with early syphilis at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Patients with secondary syphilis were more likely to achieve serological response than those with other stages.Background: While doxycycline is recommended as an alternative treatment of syphilis in patients with penicillin allergy or intolerance, clinical studies to compare serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin in treatment of early syphilis among HIV-infected patients remain sparse. ? 2014 Tsai et al.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
benzathine penicillin; doxycycline; reaginic antibody; benzathine penicillin; doxycycline; adult; aged; antibody titer; Article; comparative effectiveness; controlled study; drug response; early intervention; female; follow up; human; Human immunodeficiency virus infection; major clinical study; male; observational study; retrospective study; serology; syphilis; treatment duration; treatment outcome; blood; clinical trial; comparative study; complication; HIV Infections; middle aged; multicenter study; multivariate analysis; syphilis; syphilis serology; young adult; Adult; Doxycycline; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Penicillin G Benzathine; Syphilis; Syphilis Serodiagnosis; Young Adult
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science